Enbridge's proposal to ship dangerous tar sands oil eastward puts communities at risk: activists

More dirty tar sands oil eastward to Montreal? Yes, according to a news release sent to us by Environmental Defence this morning, stating pipeline giant Enbridge's proposed plan to ship “heavy crude” oil eastward via Line 9 pipeline, increasing the flow of the pipeline by 25 per cent to 300,000 barrels per day and putting Ontario and Quebec communities at risk of oil spills. The environmental group said Enbridge's new proposal could turn Ontario into a "sewer" for filthy tar sands oil.

After Enbridge filed yesterday to seek approval to reverse its Line 9B pipeline to bring more dangerous tar sands oil eastward to Montreal for export, environmental groups in Canada and the U.S., including Environmental Defence, Greenpeace Canada and Natural Resources Defense Council, called on National Energy Board to undertake a full environmental review of the proposal.

“This project could turn Ontario into a sewer for dangerous tar sands oil, putting communities at risk of oil spills into drinking water and onto farmland in the most populated part of the country,” said Adam Scott of Environmental Defence in the email. “And all this to allow big oil to increase tar sands production and export.”

Several municipalities situated along Line 9’s route, including Hamilton, Toronto, Burlington and Mississauga, have already taken the first step "to protect the interests of their citizens", according to the release. They are seeking answers on increased risks to health, water and the natural environment from the proposal.

”Enbridge’s plan to reverse its Line 9 pipeline opens the door to piping the toxic tar sands through Ontario and Quebec for export. Enbridge has previously denied any intention of bring tar sands oil east. However, the regulatory documents they filed today clearly opens the door to more dangerous tar sands oil,” said Dr. Keith Stewart of Greenpeace Canada in the press release.

In yesterday’s formal application to Canada’s National Energy Board, Enbridge and the National Energy Board acknowledged the line may carry “heavy crude” and its purpose would be to access “western Canadian crude.”

The National Energy Board is "required" to review all major pipeline projects or in Canada. It has already approved reversal of part of Line 9 between Sarnia, Ontario and Montreal, said Environmental Defence in the email. Citizens from the U.S. and Canada had previously submitted 41,000 comments to the Canadian National Energy Board opposing the first phase of the pipeline reversal.

"It is widely understood this filing is part of a larger oil export plan to move tar sands out of Alberta, east through Montreal and down to Maine, raising similar concerns south of the borde," read the email.

“Communities all over New England are rightfully concerned about increased risks to rivers and lakes from tar sands pipelines, with dozens of citizen-organized educational meetings and protests occurring over the last six months, and thousands of people in the region signing petitions against the pipeline,” said Danielle Droitsch of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

More in News

HTML500 in Vancouver: the future of digital literacy

“A digitally literate and competent population is a game-changer for Canada.”

Ambassador Doer says Obama risks surge in oil trains by rejecting Keystone XL

Pipeline pitched as good for reducing highway traffic, and avoiding oil-by-rail safety issues.

Squamish council votes down LNG pipeline drill tests

“I’ve been pretty clear that I don’t think this [LNG project] is in the best interests of the community,” said Squamish Mayor Patricia Heintzman.
Speak up about this article on Facebook or Twitter. Do this by liking Vancouver Observer on Facebook or following us @Vanobserver on Twitter. We'd love to hear from you.

what does the NDP really stand on pipelines?

The NDP keeps saying they are against pipelines to the coast. But the words "no Northern Gateway Pipeline" have not crossed Adrian Dix's lips. Why won't he say that? Instead he says there is going to be a made in b.c. process put in place within 7 days of an NDP government coming into office. The Enbridge company is now out there saying it expects there WILL be a Gateway pipeline built under the NDP! Wacky. Not sure where this is going. Interesting take on the issue here: http://bcpoliticalreports.com/2012/11/21/there-something-oily-about-enbridges-change-of-message-about-adrian-dix-and-the-ndp/ 

Where does the NDP really stand? We need some definitive answers but are not getting them. Also, I'd like to know whether Dix is for or against the new Lower Mainland oil pipeline proposal.

canada is for sale to whome ever wants it

The money is just too big for Stevie and his corporate pals to refuse !The Canadian taxpayer have zero say.Period.Oil tankers and the  pipeline are a 100% signed done deal. ..Stevie Harper doing everything in his power to dismantle every environmental protection law Canada has created.Enbridge complains that the laws are 'too onerous'..The Enbridge pipeline is just a part of the this mad rush to fuel  USA and China. The government is jonesing like crazy to push this pipeline through and will try and change whatever legislation that is in the way to show the USA and China that they want to do business regardless of what Canadian taxpayer vote or think Oil wins,really nice how we BC taxpayers say NO PIPELINE and the politicians we elected turn around and stick it to us.
More than two-thirds of  Canada now is owned by foreign entities, sending a majority of the industry's profits out of the country right now ! BC takes 100% of the environmental risk and we simpleton buy back our own Gas ,Oil and lumber .Problem is  that everything we buy and/or need is delivered by some sort of oil powered vehicle. Without oil we are back to the stone age.The goverment might use the "Temporary Foreign Worker program" to to by-pass Canadian workers and substitute with cheap foreign labor, All they have to do is say the employees require "specialized knowledge". We should not be giving away our resources.Keep the oil in Canada & refine it here. Tell the foreign companies to lower the prices for Canadians or we can nationalize. The excess in prices is driving the cost of living up for Canadians ,while foreign companies make the money.I am sorry folks and voter there is not one single thing any Canadians can do ! It;s a signed done deal .