Skip to Content
vo-banner.jpg

Global warming tragedy: Fraser River salmon dying as climate change heats up waters

Read More:

The DFO:

By the end of the century it is expected that at least every second year will have conditions that are more detrimental to spawning than the worst year in the normal period [1960-1990].

We are creating a river in which half the years will become more deadly to salmon than the worse year they had to deal with normally. In case that isn't clear enough they provide the following chart using dead salmon as symbols:

 

The CCCC report states:

The relationship between river temperature and survival during the spawning migration has been extensively studied. Migration mortality of adults (termed en route mortality) becomes elevated at temperatures > 18 C

River temperatures in the summer months when salmon are migrating upstream have increased by 0.33 C per decade since 1950. Thirteen of the last 20 years have been the warmest ever recorded for the Fraser River.

As water temperatures have risen, en route mortality has increased. The CCCC report says that the abundance of sockeye salmon in the river has been studied since 1977 but it wasn't until 1992 that any significant en route mortality was reported:

Generally, en route loss begins to be reported in 1992 for Early Stuart, Early summer, and Summer-runs, but not until 1996 for Late-runs. Relative to total catch and spawning ground escapement, levels of en route loss have been increasing

The BC Minsitry of Environment, the DFO and the CCCC report all describe numerous examples of how climate change is impacting almost every life stage of salmon. They all say these impacts will grow much worse as if we allow the climate to warm further.

Death by a thousand cuts

It is a tale of death by a thousand cuts. Each cut isn't enough to kill, but at some point the cumulative impact is deadly. Only recently have experts turned their focus on the cumulative climate impacts on salmon. The CCCC report tells of a recent report (in press) that evaluates the combined impact of each of these individual impacts:

the author used his expert knowledge to argue that the cumulative impacts of climate change across life stages will be much greater than the impacts on individual stages. He concludes that the 'impacts will also carry forward to the next generation, potentially leading to a downward spiral of productive capacity' and predicts a bleak future for Fraser River sockeye salmon, in which most of its habitats may become inhospitable.

We rapidly warmed BC's forests and our pine trees were decimated. Our pine forests won't recover their former health and range because we have destroyed the climate conditions they require. We've handed the keys to our forests over to our arch-competitors: insects and fire. Now our iconic and economically important timber industry is on the ropes. Triage apparently includes cutting into formerly protected forests because there just aren't enough living trees left in the traditional timber supply areas. And then what?

We are also rapidly warming and altering our great river systems like the mighty Fraser River. Our iconic and economically important wild salmon are already suffering as we destroy the climate conditions they require. Quotas have been cut for the wild salmon fishery in recent years to offset the increasing en route deaths caused by warming rivers.  The future for our wild salmon and the people who love and depend upon them looks bleak if we don't quickly switch away from oil, coal and natural gas.

Related posts:

(5) Comments

Phil June 27th 2012 | 9:09 AM

Nice article and the conclusions seem valid.

One comment though. You need to be careful when you talk about "average snowpack is declining" due to global warming. While it is clear average temperatures are increasing, that warming also leads to increased precipitation in some regions - and therefore snowpack up high. BC Hydro data ("Hydrologic Impacts of Climate Change, April 2012") shows that there has certainly been a substantial decrease of average snowpack between 1956-2005  (18% on average, but variable between none-to-47%, depending on the region).  However, their modellers can attribute the vast majority of that change to ENSO variations. Once you take that out, the remaining signal leaves only about a 4% average decrease in snowpack (probably in the noise).  Just wanted to point that out for clarity/accuracy.

The key thing is, what you pointed out clearly, that there is earlier melting of the snowpack - and as a result, the measurements of warmer temperatures in the rivers that affect those fish that spawn in the late spring and summer.

Joudy June 27th 2012 | 5:17 PM

Barry, you write on the subject of dying salmon on the Fraser and not once mention any of the evidence that shows one of the other major sources of high mortality rates ( and we could argue the only source of the decline). This evidence is what the DFO is trying so desperately to hide. Without even mentioning there is a large body of experts who disagree with the DFO "findings" shows your lack of journalistic skill - or is it journalistic integrity?

Did you forget your only information source is the same scientists who have been told they are not allowed to speak to reporters without Harper’s communications staff approval? The only information that is allowed to be released is what Harper wants released? Have you not noticed that Harper only uses “science” when it’s convenient to his needs and when science doesn’t suit his needs, science is discredited and mocked? Why would you not look for other sources of scientific opinion and research knowing any information coming out of a Harper approved piece of information is probably extremely biased and politically motivated?


You can't think that anyone reading this article, who doesn't have their job and livelihood based on the success of fish farming, could read this and not question your motives for missing the obvious.

I'm sure you will have many of the "industry farmers" on here thanking you for your "highly researched" piece of journalism. The shame of it is you know what you have done here and so does everyone else.

You are the Bagdad Bob of the Wild fish wars. When the last wild salmon drifts down the river what will your legacy read like?

 

Genoa June 28th 2012 | 12:00 AM

A study done by Michael Kent DFO in the early 90's showed that healthy salmon could withstand increases in water temperature quite remarkably. 
However, the virus or bacteria he was studying at the time became more active with increases in temperature.

I think global warming is all the more reason to get those disease-incubating fish farms out of the oceans, and to stop the dirty oil of the tarsands and the burning of coal - whether in Canada or China. 
Wild salmon may be the "canary in the coal mine" so we should be putting all of our best efforts into saving these aquatic canaries.
Afterall, we are ALL in the same coal mine. 


Bruce June 28th 2012 | 7:07 AM

The reference for increased water temeprature is Patterson et al, 2007a.

How old was the data?

BC has cooled .8C since then.

J C October 8th 2012 | 12:00 AM
The sky is warming! The sky is warming! The only hot air being emitted into the atmosphere is coming from global warming alarmists that fight to increase our taxes. Time and time again elitist people like the author have been discovered as having conspired to invent "data" to promote their hair-brained schemes of global control and taxation. Enough already. I can agree that REAL polluters caught damaging our water and lands should be held to account with stiff civil (and need-be criminal) penalties. But there is not one shred of irrefutable evidence that man is causing the earth to warm rapidly. For millions of years the climate on earth has warmed and cooled in natural cycles. And it will for millions more.