Not planning to vote Conservative? The Tories still want to know all about you

In the wake of the robo-call scandal, John Fryer penned a letter to major newspapers describing his experience attending at the Conservative-aligned Manning Centre for Democracy Campaign School. Here's a deeper look at the key players at his training.

(Page 2 of 2)

Kouvalis, meanwhile, is described by the Manning Centre website as a “campaign strategist with experience in voter profiling, telephone town halls, auto-dialing, telemarketing, direct mail, websites, and social media.” He is credited for having “worked closely with many key Ontario ridings that cement the Conservative majority” during the last election.

“We’re in the business of getting Conservatives elected and ending Liberal careers. We’re good at it,” Kouvalis told Maclean's magazine, in response to complaints last year about his company's phone calls in the Mount Royal riding.

Kouvalis developed the first virtual “at home” call centre in 2006, and his business was merged with Campaign Research Inc. in 2008. He was Toronto mayor Rob Ford’s Deputy Campaign manager and chief of staff. His wife, Amber-Joy, runs the virtual call centre that Campaign Research used to call voters for Conservatives during the federal election.

Identifying non-supporters

During Fryer’s first day of the training, Ciano and Kouvalis led a session about the mechanics of winning elections, Freyer said. Voter identification was at the core of this conversation. A key task to win an election, according to Ciano and Kouvalis, is to identify your supporters, nurture them, and ensure they get out the vote. Attendees were told about staying in touch with your voters, and informed of the services that Campaign Research offers.

Fryer recalled that in the training, instructors stressed the importance of identifying and keeping track of non-supporters. The key to victory, they said, was ensuring more of your supporters turn out to vote than theirs. In the question and answer period that following this session, some attendees discussed using robo-calling services to contact non-supporters.

Ciano, Fryer explained, gave detailed explanation of how robo-calls work, as well as techniques for recording messages, and the costs involved. He then discussed the merits of robo-calling: in addition to being inexpensive, they give the campaign manager total control of the message. Campaign Research could even write your script if you didn’t want to do it yourself.

The conversation that followed was deeply disturbing to Fryer. In a question and answer session, some attendees discussed voter suppression tactics. Attendees talked about posing as a member of another party, and about making rude calls at inconvenient times as a strategy to get the supporter of another party to not go out and vote for their candidate.  Neither Ciano, Kouvalis or Campaign Research were part of these discussions, according to Fryer's recollections.

According to Fryer, "the mood of the meeting was that this is war and that anything goes." He does not recall that attitude being condoned by Ciano, Kouvalis or Campaign Research.

He clarified that the program was not focused on robo-calls: day one, he said, was mainly about identifying supporters, while day two was about identifying non-supporters. Robo-calls were just one of many topics discussed, he said, but they were being discussed as "normal" tactics to win an election. It is important to note that many robo-calls are perfectly legal and Mr. Fryer is not suggesting that Ciano, Kouvalis or Campaign Research were advocating the illegal or unethical form of robo-calls.

Attendees left the session with Ciano’s business card in hand.  Without a list of attendees, it is difficult to know who hired his company's services, but it is clear that Campaign Research did well for themselves in the last election. In 39 ridings, Campaign Research did $389,890 worth of business. Of the 39 ridings, there are reports of at least 10 where allegations of fraud occurred.

A brief scan of campaign spending during the 2011 election from Elections Canada shows that Dean Del Mastro, MP for Peterborough paid Campaign Research $22,120.60, while Peter Braid, the MP for Kitchener-Waterloo, paid $19,120.00. Kellie Leitch from Simcoe-Grey paid a total of $21,315.19. Vancouver Quadra candidate Deborah Meredith paid $13,582.85, and Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca candidate Troy DeSouza
paid Campaign Research a total $8,144. The list goes on.

Elections Canada’s robo-call election fraud investigation has already spread to include RackNine Inc. and Responsive Marketing Group. It does not yet include Campaign Research.

Reflecting upon his experience at the training. Fryer notes:“I’ve been around politics a long time, and this is just a different place.”

Campaign Research asserts that Ciano and Kouvalis did not lead a joint session, at the time of the conference Ciano was working for the Manning Center, not Campaign Research, they did not offer instruction on robo-calls and did not offer the service until January 2011, and that no one representing Campaign Research discussed, promoted or suggested voter suppression tactics.

More in Politics

Gitxsan leaders join BC First Nations to vote for Anyone But Clark (ABC)

Two Gitxsan house groups, Gwininitxw and Luutkudziiwus urge voting that will empower First Nations, support communities, environment, and economic well-being.

B.C. Premier defends Bill 20 amendments

British Columbia Premier Christy Clark said Tuesday that a controversial provision in Bill 20 is meant to create “a level playing field” for all the political parties. Her comments come on the heels...

Jacobs and Florida and Gehl oh my! Who really influences our local politicians?

Still undecided about who to vote for? Second guessing yourself? Who really influences and inspires those candidates who are running for a seat in Vancouver's City Hall?
Speak up about this article on Facebook or Twitter. Do this by liking Vancouver Observer on Facebook or following us @Vanobserver on Twitter. We'd love to hear from you.