Civic Affairs

Civic affairs were front and centre in an interesting and engaging forum hosted this past Saturday.

I really wasn’t sure what to expect when I walked into the “Year In Review” forum hosted by previous NPA candidate Michael Geller, largely because I suspected an overwhelmingly NPA supportive crowd would be the only ones to show up.

And, for the most part, I was correct – former and current NPA board members, elected officials and supporters roamed the room, with few Vision or COPE supporters in tow.  In fact, one of those former NPA elected officials tried to tell me that the morning remained civil and well-behaved because “the right-of-centre” had been behind the organizing, suggesting that had the “left” been at the helm, chaos and hostility would have ruled the day.

This is exactly the type of comment that I have come to expect from your typical NPA, Quadra-type of supporter.  When confronted with the question, I told the individual that having grown up in Marpole/Kerrisdale, I knew first hand that civility was by no means exclusive to her end of the political spectrum.

That bit of nonsense aside, I found the morning to be a fantastic endeavour that could prove to be a model for civic engagement for all parties – assuming, of course, that the pool of interest is widened with future sessions.

First and foremoest, let me say that Michael Geller is an absolute gentleman and a scholar.  His demeanour is completely disarming and welcoming, his intent seems to be without political motivation as its driving motivation, and his genuine interest in improving Vancouver is obvious.  He admitted that my post from last week was a welcome wake-up call for him, and I thanked him for the invite.

The first panel session involved former NPA Councillor Gordon Price, former Vision Vancouver mayoral candidate Jim Green, and Geller, and was moderated by architect Joost Bakker.  14 topics were brought forward for discussion, including the Burrard Bridge bike lane trial, the Woodsward’s development, the Olympic Village, the STIR program, laneway housing, the HEAT shelters, parking and the Green agenda.

The banter between the three participants was amusing, for the simple fact that positions held true in time of election didn’t necessarily fall in line within this particular debate.  Green was passionately advocating for increased density in the city, Geller was singing the praises of how Vision Vancouver had handled the Olympic Village, and Price was strongly backing the maintenance of the social housing compoent of the Olympic Village regardless of costs.

This is what I enjoyed most about this first panel – the urban experts that were willing to advance viewpoints that had little adherence to their former partisan posts or the current state of their former political homes.

Geller was angry with the province for their lack of interest in his modular housing proposals directed towards lower income families and the homeless.  Price was fascinating in his views on the concept of “motordom,” where from the 1950s onward, cities were built according to the facilitation of the the seamless use of automobiles.  And Jim Green beamed about the Woodward’s development, which he used as a model of mixed use and composition that the Olympic Village should be patterned after.

All in all, a fantastic session that only scratched the surface of some of the most pressing issues of the day.

More in Commentary

Why free trade talks with China failed

When Prime Minister Justin Trudeau jetted off to Beijing, the media was told to expect the announcement of a free trade agreement, the first of its kind between China and a G7 country. The first sign...

A young Iranian helps Syrian refugees adjust to Canada

A young Iranian, himself, new to Canada reaches out to help Syrian refugees settle here. But with the war in Syria, tensions between Iranians and Syrians are rising. How will he succeed?

Linda Solomon Wood on a Bloomberg presidential bid

What do you think of Bloomberg's intimation he may run for president? I think it's a terrible idea.  The last time we had a strong third party candidate in a presidential race it was Ralph Nadar...
Speak up about this article on Facebook or Twitter. Do this by liking Vancouver Observer on Facebook or following us @Vanobserver on Twitter. We'd love to hear from you.