After 11 years of bringing you local reporting, the team behind the Vancouver Observer has moved on to Canada's National Observer. You can follow Vancouver culture reporting over there from now on. Thank you for all your support over the years!

First Nation groups condemn federal government's "indefensible attack" on Indigenous rights at UN meeting

(Page 2 of 2)

Like standards of accommodation and consent set out by the Supreme Court of Canada, FPIC in international law is applied in proportion to the potential for harm to the rights of Indigenous peoples and to the strength of these rights. The word "veto" does not appear in the UN Declaration.

"The right of free, prior and informed consent is crucial to us, as self-determining peoples," said Matthew Coon Come, Grand Chief of the Grand Council of the Crees. 

"The government has never explained what it means by 'veto.' Is a 'veto' absolute? If so, then a 'veto' isn't the same thing as 'consent.'"

In international law, human rights are generally relative and not absolute. The right to free, prior and informed consent in the UN Declaration is not absolute.

Grand Chief Ed John, First Nations Summit, said, "In the recent decision recognizing Tsilhqot'in title, the Supreme Court itself rejected Canada's incomprehensible position."

In its unanimous decision recognizing Tsilhqot'in ownership of a large part of their traditional lands, the Supreme Court stated in June, "Governments and individuals proposing to use or exploit land, whether before or after a declaration of Aboriginal title, can avoid a charge of infringement or failure to adequately consult by obtaining the consent of the interested Aboriginal group."

National Chief Ghislain Picard, Assembly of First Nations, said, "Canada keeps insisting that Indigenous peoples don't have a say in development on their lands. This position is not consistent with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, decisions by its own courts, or the goal of reconciliation."

Regional Chief Stan Beardy, Chiefs of Ontario, said, "Either through the social license to operate, which refers to the level of acceptance or approval that a local community provides to development, or a Notice of Assertions as provided by First Nations in Ontario this past summer, First Nations are already exercising a direct say about development on their lands -- whether Canada objects internationally or not."

Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, President of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs, said, "The Outcome Document speaks directly to the pressing human rights concerns of Indigenous Peoples in Canada such as Indigenous Peoples' participation in consent- based decisions regarding resource development, the need to close the gap in access to government services, and the dire need to address violence against Indigenous women. In light of the game-changing Supreme Court of Canada Tsilhqot'in Nation decision, Canada should have embraced the Outcome Document rather than be the only State in the United Nations to invent self-serving reasons to object."

Canada's objection to the World Conference Outcome Document contradicts Canada's 2010 statement of endorsement of the UN Declarationin which the government said, "We are now confident that Canada can interpret the principles expressed in the Declaration in a manner that is consistent with our Constitution and legal framework."

In contrast, Canada told the UN that FPIC provisions in the Declaration "run counter to Canada's constitution" and would "negate" Supreme Court mandated policies on consultation and accommodation.

"It strains credibility to think Canadian officials could actually believe the ridiculous claims they presented to the United Nations," said Michelle Audette, President of the Native Women's Association of Canada. "This kind of bad faith and dishonesty will only further tarnish Canada's reputation and erode Canada's influence on the world stage."

On 1 May 2008, over 100 scholars and experts in Canadian constitutional and international law signed an Open Letter stating that theDeclaration was "consistent with the Canadian Constitution and Charter ... Government claims to the contrary do a grave disservice to the cause of human rights and to the promotion of harmonious and cooperative relations."

The Outcome Document adopted by the UN General Assembly also calls for "equal access to high-quality education that recognizes the diversity of the culture of indigenous peoples, as well as health, housing, water, sanitation and other economic and social programmes to improve their well-being." Specific measures are urged for Indigenous people with disabilities and to address HIV/AIDS.

In addition, the Outcome Document calls for "measures which will ensure the full and effective participation of indigenous women in decision making processes at all levels and in all areas," as well as intensified efforts to stop violence against Indigenous women.

- Ad hoc coalition on the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

Statement endorsed by

Amnesty International Canada

Assembly of First Nations

Canadian Friends Service Committee

Chiefs of Ontario

Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations First Nations Summit

Grand Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee)

Indigenous World Association

KAIROS: Canadian Ecumenical Justice Initiatives

Native Women's Association of Canada

Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs

More in News

Views from a refugee camp: Who gets into heaven?

I have just returned to Vancouver Island from Greek refugee camps where I met a Yazidi man named Jason who told me about his escape from ISIS in Iraq.   His story begins on a desert road where a...

Vancouver's bicycle sharing grows as 15 new stations installed

Mobi bicycle by Shaw Go in Vancouver. Photo by Christopher Porter from Flickr Creative Commons

International Women's Day Concert celebrates female musicians who turned tragedy into triumph

Every March 8, on International Women's Day, we hear about the achievements of brilliant, talented women around the world. But how often do we learn about the physical and mental disabilities or...
Speak up about this article on Facebook or Twitter. Do this by liking Vancouver Observer on Facebook or following us @Vanobserver on Twitter. We'd love to hear from you.