This Article is part of the Up in Smoke special report See the full report

Metro Vancouver's Burnaby incinerator burning through taxpayer money

Almost $100 million in upgrades to burn metro Vancouver's garbage and little revenue to show for it. Fifth in a three-month series.

(Page 2 of 2)

According to BC Hydro statistics, the province’s sole garbage incinerator in Burnaby had the capacity to generate 131 gigawatt hours of electricity last year.

But critics say there's no public demand in BC to generate more electricity through incineration. "It's a really dirty way to be generating electricity, when we have better ways in BC," says Elaine Golds, chair of the Burke Mountain Naturalists conservation committee. The province, in fact, currently produces more than 86 per cent of its power through clean energy sources such as hydro dams, wind and other energy projects.

“Wherever incinerators are used to generate electricity, it is never a very clean process. (It’s) often termed as being dirtier than using coal, because some of the material that gets put into the incinerator shouldn’t be there in the first place," she said. 

Across the globe, burning garbage to generate electricity has been an approved method to deal with waste for decades. Metro Van has been generating energy from waste in the Burnaby incinerator since 1988. In the future, Metro Vancouver plans to recycle or divert 80 percent of waste, and use waste-to-energy incineration to recover energy from the remainder. A 2008 US study comparing recycling and waste incineration in 22 states concluded that both are “compatible waste management strategies” that do not inhibit recycling.

The BC Chamber of Commerce contests that if a new incinerator is built, opportunities for private enterprise to capitalize on any valuable materials in garbage bags will disappear.

“There’s no way they’ll have enough garbage to feed that beast by then. Incinerators of this kind in Scandinavia are already bringing waste in from as far away as Italy to feed their appetite because they can’t generate enough in their own community ... to feed these beasts,” says Winter.

“I think it is a terrible, terrible mistake,” says Marc Lee of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Lee authored a report last March examining consumer consumption and better ways to recycle. “It will lock us in to needing to produce garbage in order to feed these facilities for decades into the future and that’s not where we should be going.”

The BC Chamber of Commerce says the massive expenditure planned by Metro Van can't be justified, especially when there are companies ready and willing to deal with the excess garbage.

 “The technology continues to evolve and develop that will enable MRF’s (material recovery facilities) to take a garbage bag, crack it open and either electronically or physically separate all the stuff in it and divert it to the various streams,” says Winter. “And some will presumably go to an incinerator. Some will go to a landfill, but a lot of it will find its way into a recyclable process.”

How to deal with extra garbage? 

Metro Van says MRFs are now part of the waste-management strategy, but even with MRFs and an eventual 80 per cent diversion of the waste stream, there still will be hundreds of thousands of tonnes of garbage left over that must be dealt with.

Belkorp industries 'material recovery facility' proposal for Coquitlam

“If the MRF and all the other programs we have in place do get us to that 80 per cent, we still have 700,000 to deal with,” says Malcolm Brodie.  “If we go further than that, the plan would be that the Burnaby incinerator, which is now 25-years old, by that time it will be 35-40 years old, it’s in three sections, so you start phasing it back and you can easily do that by cutting it incrementally based on the amount of material you are dealing with.”

The BC Chamber of Commerce, private waste haulers, recycling companies and environmentalists have lined up at previous Metro Van Zero Waste Committee meetings to speak out against both the incineration plan and a strategy to control the flow of waste in the region. Elaine Golds of the Burke Mountain Naturalists says even by Metro Van’s own projections, material will be headed for the incinerator that should never be near these facilities.

“I’ve looked at the long term projections on the kind of things they anticipate sending to the incinerator and there is a shocking high component of material that should be recycled," she said. "Paper should be recycled. Wood should be recycled. A lot of plastic should be recycled and yet their intention is to put a lot of that in the stream that goes into the incinerator.”

 CORRECTION: A previous version of this article incorrectly identified BFI Canada/Progressive Waste Solutions, which opposes the incineration plan. 

More in News

Views from a refugee camp: Who gets into heaven?

I have just returned to Vancouver Island from Greek refugee camps where I met a Yazidi man named Jason who told me about his escape from ISIS in Iraq.   His story begins on a desert road where a...

Vancouver's bicycle sharing grows as 15 new stations installed

Mobi bicycle by Shaw Go in Vancouver. Photo by Christopher Porter from Flickr Creative Commons

International Women's Day Concert celebrates female musicians who turned tragedy into triumph

Every March 8, on International Women's Day, we hear about the achievements of brilliant, talented women around the world. But how often do we learn about the physical and mental disabilities or...
Speak up about this article on Facebook or Twitter. Do this by liking Vancouver Observer on Facebook or following us @Vanobserver on Twitter. We'd love to hear from you.

Special reports

Up in Smoke

A plan by the Metro Vancouver regional authority would have taxpayers spending half a billion public dollars on an incinerator to solve the region’s garbage problem.  Would that send Vancouver's...
Support this report