Will surveillance cameras be the legacy of the Stanley Cup riots?
Police, city leaning in that direction -- but civil-liberties officials aren't so sure.
They came for the 2010 Games; some of them returned for the Stanley Cup playoffs this year.
And now police and city officials are wondering, post-riot, if there's value in expanding the use of surveillance cameras.
Opinion is mixed.
The Canadian Press has the story:
VANCOUVER -- Vancouver is considering expanding the use of surveillance cameras when large events concentrate thousands of people together in one spot.
The move comes in response to a municipal report into the Stanley Cup riot concluded real-time TV footage can help emergency officials orchestrate their response while making it easier for the police to identify suspects.
The report, released Thursday along with a separate independent review of the riot, recommends the city increase the use of CCTV at large events.
"The availability of closed-circuit televisions was invaluable to the response efforts during the riot in providing real-time information to all responders,'' says the report, prepared by city manager Penny Ballem and her staff, which will be presented to council next week.
"The city and VPD (Vancouver Police Department) should bring forward to council an updated policy with regard to the future use of CCTV cameras for special events to assist with monitoring crowd activities, deployment of first responders and police, (and) identification of suspects and riot participants in the event of a significant disturbance.''
The internal report represents one of several reviews that were ordered following the June 15 riot, which saw massive crowds torch cars, smash windows and loot stores for several hours after the Canucks lost the Stanley Cup final to the Boston Bruins.
An independent report into how police and the city prepared for the playoffs was also released Thursday, concluding police were quickly overwhelmed by massive crowds, which left them unable to prevent the riot once things began spiralling out of control. That report also recommended the continued use of CCTV cameras.
Yet another report, an internal review by Vancouver police, will be released next week.
The municipal report notes CCTV cameras were installed in the downtown core in preparation for the final round of the playoffs, after weeks of Canucks games that were coupled with increasingly larger gatherings downtown.
The report does not say how many cameras were installed, but their numbers grew, particularly for the final two games.
Significantly larger crowds gathered downtown for Game 5, including thousands of spectators watching the game on giant outdoor screens in a city-organized celebration site. The night was also marked by a jump in liquor pour-outs.
A debriefing that followed the game called for extra CCTV cameras to be installed. Similar concerns after Game 6 meant another increase in the number of cameras ahead of Game 7.
Live video feeds from the cameras were available to police and the city's emergency operations centre as they co-ordinated the response during the riot, the report says.
The report also says the cameras would help police identify suspects, although the extent to which police have used CCTV footage in their investigation isn't clear.
Many cities already use CCTV cameras, but they remain controversial, with civil liberties advocates arguing such technology represents an invasion of privacy and leads to intrusive policing.
Rob Holmes, president of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, said temporary cameras often become permanent, and he said there are also cases in which cameras installed for security have then been used for other purposes.
"There are any number of things that can result from this that can make for what one would call a surveillance society where there is no privacy, there is no right to anonymity,'' Holmes said in an interview Friday.
Holmes said cameras can't prevent a riot and that there are better, less-intrusive ways to make the streets safer, such as adding more police officers.
The security plan for the last year's Winter Olympics called for hundreds of surveillance cameras to be installed temporarily on Vancouver streets, prompting the provincial and federal privacy commissioners to raise their own concerns.
In 2000, the privacy commissioner's office issued a set of guidelines on the use of CCTV cameras in the province, saying they should only be used in high-crime areas when other less-intrusive policing methods aren't working.
LeRoy Brower, an assistant privacy commissioner in B.C., said he wants to know what will happen to the cameras now that the playoffs are over and how they'll be used in the future.
Brower said any form of government surveillance must be weighed against the public's right to privacy.
"These are tough problems, they're complex, and when we look at them, we ask the question: 'How do you balance the need to protect public safety with the values of privacy?''' said Brower.
"Video surveillance is somewhat invasive and should only be used as a last resort, especially when you look at reports that question the usefulness (of cameras) in reducing crime. We have a right in Canada to not be intruded upon, we have a right to privacy.''