Insite Battle Intensifies as Opponents Square Off in Court

The federal government launched an appeal today to overturn a B.C. Supreme Court ruling that last year gave Insite, a supervised injection facility for illegal drugs in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside, a constitutional exemption to remain open. Lawyer Robert Frater, arguing for the government before a panel of three judges and a court room packed with Insite supporters, said that the previous ruling was in error when it held that federal drug laws against possession and trafficking by Insite users were unconstitutional.

"There is no constitutional obligation for the state to provide injection sites or drugs," Frater said. "The government is not obliged to provide safer ways of breaking the law...it [the decision] is essentially arguing that if one becomes addicted and can't obey the law, the law should adjust itself to accommodate the person."

The B.C. Supreme Court decision had no business trying to create public policy for the problems plaguing the Downtown Eastside, Frater said. The responsibility for drafting the laws governing drug use in Canada, Frater concluded, belonged to Parliament.

The ruling by B.C Supreme Court Justice Ian Pitfield last year granted the PHS Community Services the right to operate Insite in the absence of a Health Canada exemption from drug laws. Pitfield provided the government of Canada a year to change existing legislation to allow for medical applications of illegal drugs if these were part of a health care program.

Legal representatives from a variety of groups were also on hand, including the B.C. Attorney General, the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU), the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, PHS Community Services Society, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, and the Dr. Peter AIDS Foundation.

According to Maxine Davis, the Executive Director of the Centre of Excellence for HIV/AIDS, “Most, but not all, of our clients have problematic substance use – either illicit drugs, prescription drugs, or alcohol."

The Centre works in collaboration with the Dr. Peter AIDS Foundation, a non-profit organization specializing in health care services and programs for people with HIV/AIDS. “We feel this practice is critical to our ability to engage and treat people with HIV/AIDS who are homeless and struggling with a host of health issues," said Davis.

Read More:

More in Olympics Retort

Eight Billion Dollars Got Canadians High on the Olympics. Was it Money Well Spent?

The costs of the Olympics were absurdly higher than VANOC or any level of government was ready to admit. The final number will come in north of $8 billion. How much north we may never know due to a r

Olympic Nation

I don't much like my country these days, indeed haven't for the last week or so.  Is it simply a case of me being an anti-Olympic no-fun grinch?  Maybe.   Or maybe it’s something else...

Olympic Battle Rattle: The Rules of Engagement Have Already Been Written

The question is not whether opposing elements will meet in the streets. The question is what happens when they do?
Speak up about this article on Facebook or Twitter. Do this by liking Vancouver Observer on Facebook or following us @Vanobserver on Twitter. We'd love to hear from you.