After 11 years of bringing you local reporting, the team behind the Vancouver Observer has moved on to Canada's National Observer. You can follow Vancouver culture reporting over there from now on. Thank you for all your support over the years!

Canucks at home and on the road are a tale of two teams

Two weeks into the NHL season and one thing is becoming painfully clear about the Vancouver Canucks: they are a completely different team on home ice than they are on the road.  When playing at Rogers Arena, the Canucks have looked confident.  They’ve been tight defensively and have scored timely goals.  On the road, the Canucks have looked – for the most part – a team of individuals.  They look disjointed, sloppy defensively, and haven’t been able to score the timely goals needed to win hockey games.

 The stats are staggering eight games into the season and paint the picture of the two teams.  The Canucks four home ice games have seen them score 13 goals while giving up only 4.  The power play at home is 20% successful, while the penalty kill is 94.7% effective.  On the road – where the Canucks own four of their five losses – the stats are opposite almost across the board.  The Canucks have managed only 7 road goals, while giving up 15.  The power play on the road is consistent – running at 23.5% - however the penalty kill away from home sits at 68.8% which is good for 26th in the league in that category.

 Playing well at home and struggling on the road is nothing new for a Canucks team that tied Washington for most home wins last season, but struggled to a game under the .500 mark on the road.

 While playing at home, the Canucks play an up-tempo puck possession game built around playing off the rush and overwhelming the opposition with overall team speed.  On the road, the focus seems to shift to playing a more mistake free game instead of pushing the pace of the game to the Canucks level.  When the team plays this way, they often end up on their heels as it takes away the skating advantage the Canucks boast and gives the opposition more time controlling the puck. 

 The Canucks also feel their injuries a lot more when playing on the road.  The absences of Dan Hamhuis, Keith Ballard, Sami Salo, and Alex Burrows are magnified on the road as the Canucks have last change and are often forced to play to their weakest defensemen against the other team’s top players and cannot match their forward lines the way they would like. 

 For the Canucks to live up to all the preseason hype surrounding the team they’ll need to find the consistency to play their home style on the road.  Having eight of the next nine days off should help them get some bodies healthy, but for the team to be successful on the road they need to play the same style of game night after night regardless of the venue.  A true measure of an elite team is how well they fare away from the friendly confines of their home arena.  Chicago was a top road team last season, and if the Canucks have plans on a deep playoff run this year they’ll almost certainly need to figure out their road play before that can happen.

More in Canucks Report

Blame for Canucks' first round defeat to the Sharks starts at the top

In the end, it was a disaster which was surprisingly easy to predict. The inconvenient evidence has been accumulating since the trade deadline all the way back in 2012 — when Canucks management...

Playoff Canucks will surprise, for better or worse

We now return to your regularly scheduled programming. The Vancouver Canucks—carrying their usual, cocksure swirl of complete unpredictability—are back playing games into May. Questions of Roberto...

Mike Gillis' very bad, very uncharacteristic year

If there’s a word which summarizes the Mike Gillis and Laurence Gilman philosophical approach to running a sports franchise it would be this: Control. Not in the sense of micromanagement or outright...
Speak up about this article on Facebook or Twitter. Do this by liking Vancouver Observer on Facebook or following us @Vanobserver on Twitter. We'd love to hear from you.