Skip to Content

Wildrose surge in Alberta worrisome for BC

Why British Columbians should care about the Alberta elections, Danielle Smith and the Wildrose Party.

Read More:
Danielle Smith, leader of Alberta's Wildrose Party | Photo by Dave Cournoyer

“I think if you had problems with the current Conservatives, you ain’t seen nothing yet."

John Church, an associate professor in political science at the University of Alberta, was referring to Danielle Smith's Wildrose Party, the ultra-conservative alternative to the province's Progressive Conservative Premier, Alison Redford. According to Church, a Wildrose majority in Alberta will mean even less standing in the way of the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline.

“If the Wildrose Party wins a majority, there will be more ideological alignment between the government of Alberta and Ottawa, as we’ve seen for some time," he said. "And that will mean that environmental regulations in Alberta will likely be softened, particularly in relation to developments in oil and gas.”

Alberta's ultra-conservative Wildrose Party on climate change

Smith’s views on climate change have become a particularly contentious subject this week, after she stated her belief that the “science isn’t settled” over human causes of global warming. Incumbent leader Redford, on the other hand, at least recognizes the fact that climate change is a “real issue on the international stage” and that it has an important impact on energy production and on Alberta’s reputation.

Mike Hudema, an Edmonton-based climate and energy campaigner with Greenpeace Canada, says recent revelations about the provincial frontrunner (nicknamed “Dani the Denier”) are extremely unsettling.

“We learned just days ago that Danielle Smith still believes that the science on climate change is out, that there should be no real government involvement when it comes to regulating the tar sands industry, and that these projects should move forward as fast as market forces should carry them,” Hudema told the Observer, echoing sentiments he expressed in a Greenpeace blog post earlier this week.

“All of those are very scary prospects for anybody that cares about the environment, that cares about communities, that cares about health—because all signs point to really unregulated tar sands development.”

Hudema says the possibility of having a climate skeptic as the next premier will not only hurt environmental policy, but could also be severely detrimental to the province’s international reputation.

(1) Comments

Bruce April 20th 2012 | 7:07 AM

Arctic Sea Ice is normal

Antarctic Sea Ice is above normal.

Himilayan Glaciers are fine

Warming isn't killing Polar Bears, hunter are killing Polar Bears.

Penguins are just fine

Temperatures are way down from 1998