Enbridge trying to "silence" speakers at oil sands pipeline hearings: MLA

Just days before regulatory hearings scheduled in Prince Rupert, NDP MLA Gary Coons criticized Enbridge’s attempts to “silence” Northern Gateway critics.

Photo of Joint Review Panel hearings by Carrie Saxifrage

Just a few days ahead of regulatory hearings in Prince Rupert regarding the Northern Gateway pipeline, Enbridge has submitted a request to the Joint Review Panel to impose time limits for presentations by non-Aboriginal intervenors.

North Coast MLA Gary Coons, who is scheduled to present at the hearings, says the company’s tactics do a “great disservice” to pipeline critics and citizens in the key coastal riding.

Time limits for non-Aboriginal intervenors

In the initial request, Enbridge Northern Gateway VP Ken MacDonald claimed that oral evidence from non-Aboriginal participants so far has not been meeting the Panel’s criteria, mainly because it is considered “in the nature of argument”.

“To further assist the parties and the efficiency of the process, Northern Gateway requests that the Panel consider limiting the time for oral evidence that is allocated to non-Aboriginal participants to 10 minutes each,” MacDonald wrote in the letter.

He listed a number of individuals and groups scheduled to present at the Prince Rupert hearings on February 17 and 18, including Coons and Nathan Cullen, the NDP MP for Skeena-Bulkley Valley. Both politicians were originally given 60 minutes for their presentations.

After discovering Enbridge’s request, Coons responded with another letter to the Joint Review Panel, asking them to reject the company’s proposal.

“I’m disappointed and concerned that Enbridge is attempting to silence voices, especially from the riding that’s going to be most impacted—the North Coast,” said Coons.

“It appears that they don’t want to hear what’s actually happening in our riding, where it’s going to be all the risk and no benefits.”

The hearing guidelines say the Panel will accept oral evidence of two kinds: traditional knowledge from Aboriginal peoples, and personal knowledge about how the project could potentially affect an individual or community.

Intervenors are not supposed to present oral evidence based on science or the views of others, and they are not to include detailed information that could be considered “argument”.

"Suspicious and shameful" timing

Coons says he has been preparing for his presentation for months, and is familiar with the process, having attended previous hearings in other Northern communities.

“I went to Terrace, I went to Kitimat, I’ve been following online and I’ve been thinking about it for probably four or five months, how I was going to present [my evidence]. I believe what I’m going to say and share will follow the parameters of the procedural direction that was given to all of us,” he told the Observer.

Nathan Cullen has also lashed out against Enbridge for trying to take control of the hearings, noting the “suspicious and shameful” timing of the company’s request.

"This letter came out the same week that the only Member of Parliament will be presenting to the panel. It also happens to be the Member whose riding is most affected...This letter is obviously an effort to silence elected officials," said Cullen in an article on the Northern View website.

Like Cullen, Coons believes he has a responsibility as an MLA to voice the concerns of his constituents at the upcoming hearings. He says decisions about running the public hearings should be left to the independent Panel members and not to those who stand to benefit from “silencing voices”.

“The Panel is in a very difficult position. They’re hearing loud and clear, and I believe getting all the evidence that this is not in the public interest,” said Coons.

“I think it’s pretty significantly stacked up against the board, and I hope that they take a close look and acknowledge that this is not the project to go through Northern British Columbia.”

So far, the NDP MLA says he has not received any response from the Panel or its secretary. As far as he’s concerned, he and Cullen are still scheduled to give their evidence based on the previously allotted time.

Enbridge has not yet responded to the Vancouver Observer’s requests for comment.

More in Environment

Photo of tree tree pest killing forests

Spawn of climate change devouring forest at alarming rates

A forest pest is doubling in size each year, expanding beyond its historic range and threatening to spread across the vast boreal forest, but it’s not the British Columbia mountain pine beetle.
Winning Student

David Thompson Student's Fuel Cell Powers Multiple Science Fair and Essay Honours

Vancouver student Austin Wang took top honours at the DuPont Challenge Science Essay Competition, with his essay titled The Next Sustainable Energy Source-Bacteria. The David Thompson Secondary...

Dire climate change warning in third comprehensive report commissioned by U.S.

“Harm to the nation will increase substantially in the future unless global emissions of heat-trapping gases are greatly reduced," scientists warn in the new report.


I joined the NDP to support

I joined the NDP to support Nathan for leader.  We need someone in Ottawa that is passionate about stopping this pipeline! www.nathancullen.ca

Tyranny in Canada

Listening to the Northern Gateway hearings livestreaming now, my hope of a fair and democratic society are faultering. The hearings show me that the 4000 witnesses are so limited to what they are allowed to say, they are effectively gagged from expressing their true concerns and the true magnitude of this pipe dream on their livelihoods and lives. Speakers cannot mention facts found online or in the media, statistics, contaminations, illness, lawsuits, human rights violations or corp. practices all not allowed to be mentioned. We as Canadians, still have freedom of information and freedom of speech (for now). I have been posting updates, stats and petitions regarding the Northern Gateway and Keystone XL Pipe(dreams): http://kim-hunter.blogspot.com/

We will have to give access to the coast for shipping to other countries, but we can pick the method that it is done with. The pipeline is the cheapest for oil companies and any cleanup to the area around the pipeline can be defered and hidden as it has in the past, particularly with this company.

Some of the benefits of shipping by rail are that any spills are limited to the size of the tank car, the spill is reported immediatly, the tracks are used by other trains so other leakage would be reported sooner, twinning the tracks to Prince Rupert may be cheaper than the pipeline as part of it is already done, loading tankers in Prince Rupert keeps them out of Kitimat which will be having large LNG tankers coming in and out of that inlet.