Skip to Content

Naomi Klein after Keystone XL pipeline protest arrest

Read More:
Photo from TarSandsAction.org

Canadian author and activist Naomi Klein called the Canadian government a "global advertising agency" for the oil industry and spoke in detail this week with the Vancouver Observer about  her recent arrest at the White House while protesting the Keystone XL oil pipeline alongside First Nations leaders. 

Citing a television "media blackout" and tactics of intimidation in the U.S.,  Klein had much to say about the controversial Alberta-to-Texas pipeline, which has been opposed by indigenous groups, activists and Nobel Peace laureates.

“The Harper government ... has completely abandoned any pretext of representing the people of Canada and indigenous people on this," Klein said. "Oil companies have enough money to do their own lobbying. They don't need the Alberta and Canadian government traveling around the world as traveling salesmen for them, yet this is what they're doing. The idea that they can in any way be trusted by indigenous people living near the tar sands. That's why people went to Washington to take a message directly to President Obama.”

Indigenous groups, in particular, have a "lot to lose" if the pipeline project is approved, as the pipelines would cross Native lands and potentially contaminate drinking water, the author of "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism", said. So far, Canada's Environment Minister Peter Kent has voiced support for the project, citing findings in a government report that the pipeline would have minimal environmental impact.

Putting bodies on the line

Although Klein told the CBC last week that she hadn’t planned on being arrested, she said that it was a risk that she and others took in order to get the message across to President Obama.

“It was interesting because at the start of the protest you would see a lot of older people being arrested,” she said. “(Environmental writer) Bill McKibben had wanted that, in the original letter he wrote (to invite people to the Keystone XL protests). He said you can’t just leave the risks to this to young people.”

Klein said that although older people were among the first to take on the sit-in protest, the protesters that she met on her way there were primarily young women in their 20s. Protesters varied from actress Darryl Hannah to NASA chief James Hansen to aboriginal leaders from both sides of the border.

Klein said the U.S. appeared to be taking a “tactic of intimidation” during the first round of arrests, when it held McKibben and others for three days in jail. However, the arrests failed to scare off others from joining the protest. 

“It backfired,” she said. “Later, there were so many people getting arrested that they had to let some people out because they didn't have enough room. On the last day, over 240 people were arrested.”

Klein said that she was held for a total of three hours before being let go. 

“We were treated respectfully,” she said. "It's not fun, having your hands cuffed behind your back for three hours, but it was done as polite as it could have been.”

Holding Obama accountable

Among the protesters, Klein said, were many people who had supported Obama’s presidential bid in 2008.

“I met some really wonderful young people who had busted their butts working for Obama,” she said. “I think politically, it’s very important for Obama to see. With this next election, he has to think about the people who knock on doors and sleep on floors for him. It's not as if he's going to lose these votes – but will they work for him? That's the real question.”

She said she was relieved to find that many young people who had worked to bring Obama to power hadn't given up on their political engagement. 

“It was always in my fear that Obama would breed a new generation of cynics,” she said.

“People whose hopes he had raised, through soaring speeches -- the issues that engaged them were essentially abandoned by the President. I think what was exciting was that people weren't just giving into that cynicism. They were trying to hold Obama accountable for the hope he inspired in them and finding other ways to do politics than just working for a politician. I was really heartened by that.” 

Video below: Young Canadians, including Bridgette DePape, protesting Keystone XL Pipeline at White House 


Media blackout

It was striking to me that there was good coverage by the print media by New York Times and Washington Post but there was almost a complete media blackout by the television networks. It's hard to counter when you don't even get your message out.”

In a speech in Washington on Saturday, Klein talked about how oil companies marketed Canadian tar sands as a more politically correct alternative to oil from the Middle East.

Did you know they’re running ads on the Oprah Winfrey Network, saying that by buying tar sand oil, you’re helping to free women in Saudi Arabia?” she asked.   

Klein said she found it strange that Canadian tar sand oil is being advertised as “Ethical Oil” to the US public, given that the oil from Alberta is not guaranteed to even enter the U.S. market.

Screenshot from Ethical Oil advertisement

“This is just about oil companies wanting to make as much money as they possibly can,” she said. “Exxon Mobil is running ads 24/7 on MSNBC and CNN saying the tar sands are making America more secure and less dependent on Middle East oil. Meanwhile these companies all do business in the Middle East.”

“There's absolutely no guarantee that oil is going to enter the US gas. They can export this. and it will be sold to the highest bidder … It’s a bait and switch. We saw this recently with coal -- Obama green-lighted a bunch of new coal licenses in Wyoming and Montana just a few months ago and these companies had also used the exact same "energy security" argument saying we need more coal for energy security. As soon as they got the lease, they turned around and said, 'actually, we want to sell the coal to China.'”

British Columbia: an excuse for the tar sands 

Klein pointed out said that British Columbia has a major part to play in stopping the Keystone XL Pipeline. Buried in a lengthy report on the pipeline by the U.S. State department is a section citing B.C. oil activity as a justification for building the pipeline.  

“The U.S. State department issued a report that said that if the oil doesn't come to the US through Keystone  XL, it will go through British Columbia through one of the new pipelines to China,” she said, in reference to the proposed "Northern Gateway" pipeline that would run from Edmonton to Kitimat.

“B.C. is what’s letting (the Obama administration) sleep at night,” she said.

Klein was referring to a report issued by the U.S. State Department claiming that in the event that the Alberta-Texas pipeline were not built, it would be possible to build a pipeline expansion to British Columbia, which would enable oil exports to Asia.

Chart from report pointing to "Northern Gateway" (the proposed pipeline to the BC Coast) as alternative to Keystone XL pipeline. KXL stands for Keystone XL.

While the report acknowledges that efforts to build oil pipelines through B.C. have met with "strong resistance from First Nations and environmental groups", Klein said she believes the U.S. government is understating the political implications of their report. "It's an incredibly flawed assumption ... anyone who can say that does not understand B.C.," she said.  "If they start ramping up the Northern Gateway and increase the numbers of tankers going through Vancouver, they will wake up a sleeping giant. 
"British Columbia has an important role to play in getting the message out. If there is no guarantee that they can get the oil out of BC, they have to take responsibility for the climate impact of this increased production." 
Video below: Naomi Klein speaks in Washington, D.C. at the Keystone XL pipeline protest in Washington before her arrest

(3) Comments

Barry Saxifrage September 8th 2011 | 2:14 PM

Great article. Naomi Klein is exactly right that Keystone XL is about exporting Alberta carbon far beyond the USA.

Alberta carbon merchants acknowledge that even USA isn't a big enough market for the pile of carbon they want to sell. They have to get to salt water so they can extract even more carbon than USA and Canada can burn.

We are talking a lot of carbon. That is why Bill McKibben calls Alberta's carbon deposits one of the largest carbon bombs on the planet. It is why NASA climate scientist James Hansen says that exploiting them means "game over" for a safe weather and climate system.

Two important points are often missed in the discussions of Keystone XL:

1) The Alberta carbon deposits are NOT oil. They are hard tarry bitumen, similar to asphalt. These are then rendered into a form of synthetic "oil". This is a critical point because we are deciding as a nation and globe just what sources of carbon we will vapourize in our quest to keep our "oil" addiction fully fueled. Other carbon deposits that can be turned into liquid fuel include coal, shale, corn, natural gas...even methane hydrates. Where is the limit? We know the weather system will go postal on us if we burn all that carbon. If it is OK to vapourize Alberta asphalt to keep the oil-paradigm going...then it will OK to vapourize all the coal too. Did you know that Venezuela has even bigger carbon deposits than Alberta that are poised to follow into the "oil" pipeline? Hansen understands this threat. Unleashing full exploitation of Alberta carbon into the global oil flow will open a greenlight the notion that every crumb of carbon is acceptable to burn as long as it is transformed into "oil" first.

2) Obama isn't just saying, sure build a pipeline. He is going to have to certify -- all by himself -- that exploiting carbon deposits like Alberta Asphalt and selling them into the global marketplace to maintain oil demand even longer is "in the National Interest". He isn't saying that he finds no big problem with it...he is saying that it is important that America do this.

Our prime minister is playing a very dangerous game with the stability of our climate and weather systems. He is actively promoting the message that humanity should transform and vapourize all the carbon we can find to keep the world hooked on oil as long as possible. Worse he is saying that doing so is "ethical". Obama is poised to kick our other foot off the cliff by saying that doing so is in the "national interest" of Americans.

The stakes are huge. If "oil sands" are OK, then get ready for "oil shale", "oil hydrates" and "oil rocks" (aka coal). It will be a green light to burn it all.

Dr Hansen has coined a term for this scenario: Venus Syndrome. The solar system has already done that kind of CO2 experiment once before.

Warren Clarke September 21st 2011 | 8:20 PM

Why does Naomi Klein hate women?

D Smithers September 27th 2011 | 1:13 PM

This is an interesting point you bring up Warren although I believe it is under your hair. Let me attempt to answer your question with an equally perplexing statement. Some cucombers become pickles but not all.

Chew on that for a while before rebutting.