Charitable Fraser Institute received $4.3 million in foreign funding since 2000

Fraser Institute's American funders adds fuel to debate about charitable status
Graphic by Craig Fleisch (craigfleisch.ca) for The Vancouver Observer.

The Fraser Institute, Canada's leading right-wing think tank, received over $4.3 million in the last decade from eight major American foundations including the most powerful players in oil and pharmaceuticals, The Vancouver Observer has learned.

In May, it was found that the US oil billionaire Koch brothers gave the Fraser Institute half a million dollars since 2007.  But further investigation shows the insitute received funding from other major US foundations.

The issue of foreign funding of progressive Canadian charities has been under scrutiny since Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver released an open letter last January accusing "environmental and other radical groups" of influencing Canadian politics.

He said that these groups "use funding from foreign special interest groups to undermine Canada's national economic interest."

The rhetoric from Ottawa came amidst increasing opposition nationally to  the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline, which Prime Minister Stephen Harper has said is "of vital interest" to Canada. 

The government focused on environmental charities being funded by Tides Canada, and also targeted the David Suzuki Foundation, which opposed the pipeline.

In June, the government passed Bill C-38, an omnibus bill which included an additional $8 million to the Canada Revenue Agency to audit charities suspected of receiving foreign funding to finance political advocacy beyond the accepted 10% of overall activities allowed under CRA codes.

"Basically, they (government authorities) are trying to undermine the anti-pipeline wing of the environmental movement by associating it ... with radicalism,” said Laurentian University sociology professor and national security expert Gary Kinsman.  

But the Fraser Institute apparently has not been the subject of scrutiny, despite the fact that, according to U.S. tax documents, from between 2000 and 2010, the charitable orgainization received substantial money from American foundations. 

"The Fraser Institute gets taxpayer's money as a write-off and they do nothing but influence public policy," Liberal Senator Grant Mitchell told The Vancouver Observer.

Foreign funding: for which projects? 

The Fraser Institute received $1.7 million from "sources outside Canada" in one year alone, according to the group's 2010 Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) return.

Fraser Institute President Niels Veldhuis told The Vancouver Observer that the Fraser Institute does accept foreign funding, but he declined to comment on any specific donors or details about the donations.

The Fraser Institute describes itself as an "independent non-profit research and educational organization". It advocates for policies to support free enterprise and small government. Critics have cited endeavors such as publicly calling on the government to change election spending laws, or pushing provinces to adopt “right-to-work” legislation.

 U.S. funding for the Fraser Institute supported projects ranging from "general operations" to "the economic freedom index."

The pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly and Company Foundation most recently gave $25,000 for "general health policy funding."

The Fraser Institute regularly publishes studies, news releases, videos, articles and commentaries criticizing Canadian public health care and promoting faster approval times for drugs in Canada, frequently citing the U.S. as comparison.
 
In 2011 it called for a five-year suspension of the Canada Health Care Act to experiment with cost-sharing and privatization.
 

The Fraser Institute and conservative public figures

The institute has also been an incubator for Canada's leading conservative public figures. Ezra Levant, a Sun media television host, columnist and author of Ethical Oil, interned at the Fraser Institute after a fellowship with the Koch Foundation. Levant is now one of the most outspoken proponents of big oil projects in Canada, having given numerous presentations on economics, as well as a special three-part presentation called "Ethical Oil: Ezra Levant and the Case for Canada's Oil Sands." 

Former Ethical Oil spokesperson and political commentator Kathryn Marshall was a development associate at the Fraser Institute.

Wildrose leader Danielle Smith interned at the Fraser Institute during her twenties, an experience which “imbued her with a passion for Ayn Rand and charter schools”, according to The Walrus Magazine. 

She became an intern with the encouragement of Tom Flanagan, a Fraser Institute senior fellow and Stephen Harper mentor. 

The institute's considerable funding from US foundations have stirred no criticism from Ottawa. 

Liberal Senator Robert W. Peterson criticized the government for unbalanced treatment of charities. "You have to be fair to all, not just pick on one group that doesn't share your views.There has to be a level playing field," he said.

Last 10 years of foreign funding for The Fraser Institute

1. Eli Lilly and Company Foundation, Lilly Endowment Inc.

2010 donation: $325,000
Total combined contributions since 2001: $2,792,000
Source: Eli Lilly and Company at Foundation Center, Lilly Endowment Inc. at Foundation Center.

Eli Lilly and Company is a global pharmaceutical corporation, with offices in 17 countries.

The company is no stranger to political and medical ethics controversies.

It is the sole manufacturer of Posilac (also known as Bovine Growth Hormone, or BGH) a controversial hormone used to boost milk production in cows.

BGH was banned in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Israel and all European Union countries with reports linking an increased risk of cancer with the hormone. Lilly bought the rights to BGH from Monsanto, a multinational corporation widely condemned for its unethical business practices.

2. Charles G. Koch Foundation, Claude R. Lambe Foundation

2010 donation: $150,000
Total combined contributions since 2001: $500,500
Source: Foundation Center.

David and Charles Koch are U.S. oil billionaires whose philanthropic spending aims to propel a far right Republican agenda. Their company, Koch Industries, owns 25 per cent of Canadian oil sands imports. 

The Koch brothers' enterprises in the Athabasca oil sands produce roughly 250,000 barrels of oil imports a year.

The Fraser Institute has published a number of reports and commentaries about policy reactions to climate "alarmism”.

Al Jazeera reporter Bob Abeshouse wrote that the Kochs are "radical libertarians" who have "poured millions into think tanks and academia to influence the battle over ideas."

“The Koch brothers gave the money that founded it [The Tea Party.]  It’s like they put the seeds in the ground,” a Republican campaign consultant who worked for the Koch brothers told The New Yorker.

They fund the climate denial machine through the Cato Institute, which they founded and funded to the tune of $14 million.   

The Koch brothers' Claude R. Lambe Foundation also funds the Montreal Economic Institute, the Fraser Institute's ideological counterpart on the east coast.

3. Searle Freedom Trust

2010 donation: $100,000
Total combined contributions since 2001: $200,000
Source: Foundation Center.

The Searle Freedom Trust was founded in 1998 to "foster research and education on public policy issues that affect individual freedom and economic liberty."

Among its chairs is Christopher DeMuth, former president of The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI) -- one of the most influential pro-business and conservative think tanks in the United States. 

DeMuth currently holds the D.C. Searle Chair there, researching government regulation, culture, and American politics.

4. Chase Foundation of Virginia

2010 contribution: $17,421
Total combined contributions since 2001: $145,061
 
Derwood S. Chase, Jr., who leads the foundation and a boutique investment firm based in Virginia, is also on the board of trustees with David H. Koch at the Reason Foundation, an influential right wing think tank in the U.S.
 
The Chase Foundation of Virginia is also a regular donor to the Montreal Economic Institute.
 
5. Pierre F. and Enid Goodrich Foundation

2010 contribution: $15,000
Total combined contributions since 2001: $170,000
 
The Foundation is one of the Fraser Institute's most consistent funders, contributing every year since 2001 between $10,000 up to $30,000 per year.
 
According to Bridge Project, it contributes regularly to other pro-free market and libertarian think tanks such as the Heritage FoundationAtlas Economic Research Foundation and the Koch-founded Cato Institute.
 

6. The John Templeton Foundation

2010 contribution: $0
Total combined contributions since 2001: $500,000
Source: Foundation Center

The John Templeton Foundation is known as one of America's wealthiest Conservatives, pouring money into SuperPACs (political action committees) to help elect religious right wing Republicans to U.S. Congressional and Senate positions. 
 
John "Jack" Templeton (nicknamed "The Devout Donor" by Bloomberg Business Week) was part of the Koch brothers' million-dollar donor club events, according to an article by Gavin Aronsen in Mother Jones Magazine's inside account of a Koch brothers' seminar.
 
Templeton, however, is too complex to label as purely "conservative". His foundation has provided funding to support the Dalai Lama, as well as anti-gay marriage groups. 
 
Prominent scientists have criticized the John Templeton Foundation for attempting to apply scientific legitimacy to religious questions. 
 
The Foundation also awarded the Montreal Economic Institute its 2004 Templeton Freedom Award Grants for Institute Excellence.  
 
7. The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, Inc.

2010 contribution: $0
Total combined contributions since 2001: $20,000
 
The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation is one of the "largest philanthropic foundations responsible for the financial backing of the right-wing agenda for nearly twenty years," according to Right Wing Watch
 
The foundation's mission is “strengthening American democratic capitalism and the institutions, principles, and values that sustain and nurture it."
 
“We’re part of the right-wing movement,” said the foundation president and CEO Michael Grebe to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in 2011.
 
According to the Bridge Project, it has donated to "virtually every major player in the conservative intellectual cavalry," such as the Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute, and the Cato Institute.
 
In 2010, the Bradley Foundation gave away over $42 million.
 
From 2001-2009 it handed out almost as much as all seven Koch and Scaife foundations combined.
 
8. The Jeld-Wen Foundation

2010 contribution: $0
Total combined contributions since 2001: $15,000
 
The Jeld-Wen Foundation was founded by Richard D. Wendt, funded by his window and door manufacturing company.
 
It sponsors right-wing think tanks such as the Cato Institute, but also raised funds for the David Suzuki Foundation.
 
No comment from Canada Revenue Agency on political activities
 

Minister of National Revenue Gail Shea stated that she could not comment on any specific cases, including the Fraser Institute's political activities.

"Our Government understands that registered charities are an important part of our society, and encourages Canadians to donate generously, but also to do their homework," she wrote in an email to The Vancouver Observer.

"In order to protect Canadian interests we have a duty to ensure that these organizations are operating properly and in compliance with federal laws. In cases where the activities of a charity are suspect CRA will conduct a review and take action as appropriate under the Act."

 

With files from Jenny Uechi

More in Politics

Prime Minister Harper defends Chuck Strahl

"Not a scintilla of evidence" that former SIRC chair Chuck Strahl had done anything wrong whatsoever, Harper insists.

Musqueam Indian Band and City of Vancouver sign new agreement

"A long time coming": rare agreement between two independent governments.

MP Mark Strahl backpedals on Enbridge connections

“Is it a concern that I am related to Parliamentary secretary Mark Strahl?” wrote Chuck Strahl, Mark's father, in a January 7 email to federal Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson.  Mark Strahl is...

Comments

Surprise, Surprise

This shouldn't come as a shock. Business and other interests, on different ends of the spectrum, fund 'think tanks' as propaganda mills. Left-wing examples are the Coalition for Gun Control and Project Ploughshares, which receive huge amounts of funding from the London, England-based International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA)--in turn funded by billionare donors like the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations. CAIR-Can, 'Canadian' Muslim Students' Associations, and Salafist mosques in Canada are funded by Saudi money. IANSA has funded gun control lobbying efforts from Australia to Brazil. The nuclear and wind, hydroelectric lobbies fund anti-oil and anti-coal campaigns. And domestic corporate donations grease the wheels of David Suzuki's foundation: chartered banks, developers, and REITs being the major patrons. This is why the David Suzuki Foundation refuses to acknowledge the environmental issues (sprawl, unsustainable local water consumption, landfill use) associated with mass immigration and attendant housing starts.

In response to surprise surprise Ira

The point of the issue is that the tory government has deemed all foreign funding to groups that support the environement as acts of terrorism. However funding for groups that work to keep the Tories elected is somehow not a problem. There is so little this current government does that can be considered even handed, fair minded, or democratic that I truly fear that Canada will need to go the way of other countries in order to wrest control from these fascists.

Fraser - Donner Foundation - Funded Canada's New Constitution?

The Donner Canadian Foundation is also a project of the Fraser Institute.  Back in 1976-79, Donner supplied funding to the Canadian Bar Association (non-governmental organization of Canadian lawyers) for work to be done by its "Committee on the Constitution" of Canada.  That Committee "recommended" a "new" constitution for Canada.  Its report was published under the title "Toward A New Canada"; and in French, "Vers un nouveau Canada".  The recommendations in the report seem to me to largely echo the designs of Pierre Elliott Trudeau from his very early days as a functionary in the Privy Council Office of Canada, circa 1949-1951.  I kind of suspect that the CBA Committee -- led by a Rhodes Scholar (and future supreme court of Canada judge, Gerard Vincent La Forest) -- was funded largely to make it seem that persons other than Trudeau had come up with these ideas.  I think the Committee was a kind of "laundry" facility to "whiten" Trudeau's ideas, which I suspect he got from the Rhodes-Milner group whose front in Canada is the Canadian Institute of International Affairs (CIIA), now called the CIC-Open Canada.  The so-called "new" constitution "recommended" by the CBA committee was actually a COUP D'ETAT intended to overthrow the lawful Parliament and Legislatures of Canada, and replace them with different institutions on different principles, subordinate to a judiciary with new implied powers to nullify laws whose political policy might be inconsistent with the views of the new supreme court under the new constitution.