Obama approves border-crossing fracked gas pipeline used to dilute tar sands

Graphic from Kinder Morgan website

While the fate of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline hangs in balance, the U.S. quietly approved another major border-crossing pipeline proposal by Kinder Morgan last week.  

Kinder Morgan Cochin LLC is now allowed to reverse and expand to build a 1,900-mile proposed pipeline to transport gas produced by hydraulic fracturing of the Eagle Ford Shale basin in Texas north into Alberta. It would carry gas condensate that is used to dilute the bitumen in the tar sands. The extra-thick oil produced in the tar sands needs to be cut with 30 per cent condensate so it can be carried, according to the Financial Post

The Cochin pipeline has had some safety issues in the past, however. Last year, the National Energy Board sent Kinder Morgan a letter regarding Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) failure in the U.S. back in 2003. At the time, the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) issued an order imposing a 20 per cent pressure restriction on the pipeline. Kinder Morgan later voluntarily imposed a further restriction on the operating pressure and received approval to increase  the operating pressure of the pipeline in US to 6895 kPa (1000 psi) in March 2012.

But the NEB wrote that Kinder Morgan could not increase pressure of the Cochin pipeline in Canada, after it found the company's crack detection methodology to be lacking. From the letter: 

While Kinder Morgan has claimed there are no similar integrity issues on the Cochin Pipeline in Western Canada, the presence of significant SCC on the Cochin Pipeline has been previously reported to the Board by BP. 

Although Kinder Morgan has conducted inspections for SCC on the Cochin Pipeline in Western Canada through in-line inspection employing a Transverse Field Magnetic Flux Leakage Inspection tool and applying the Kinder Morgan Assessment Protocol, the Board has previously deemed the crack detection methodology employed by Kinder Morgan to be inappropriate.

 

High demand for diluent among Alberta's tar sands companies has created a growing market for U.S. producers of natural gas liquids. 

Environmentalists fear that the Cochin expansion will boost bitumen production and increase greenhouse gas emissions. But soon, they may not find their opposition to such projects severely limited by law. On the day before the Cochin project approval, the U.S. House also approved a bill that, if made law, would charge $5,000 to individuals or groups to file an official protest. 

Read More:

More in Environment

Ian McAllister tidal wolf photo - Great Bear Wild - used with permission

Great Bear Rainforest photographer urges a halt on tar sands oil

Spotting a pair of hungry wolves return to the same tidal spot on B.C.'s rainforest coast he's seen them come to for years, photographer Ian McAllister whipped into action: zipping up his dry suit,...

BC's lumber industry celebrates 40 years in Japan

Delegates from British Columbia's 2014 Forestry Asia Trade Mission helped celebrate the 40th anniversary of the Canada Wood Office and the BC Council of Forest Industries (COFI) establishing a...
Christy Clark photo

After Petronas' threats, BC tries to deliver LNG tax plan that pleases both industry and citizens

The B.C. government getting ready to announce the specifics of the LNG Income Tax.

Comments

Not Surprising

The Obama Administration is very pro tight oil & gas development, so it is not surprising that the approval would be granted to Kinder Morgan for this new pipeline crossing.

All pipelines!!

All pipe lines must be made of double hulled construction. New hulls placed around old pipelines. A fibre optic or copper sensor between the hulls to warn of any leaks. I don't like any pipelines but it looks like we are going to have to live with them so lets make them all world class. Canada can lead the way rather then follow. While we are selling this oil & gas a percetage of profits should be put into moving forward with clean energy for the future. Thermal, wind & solar !!  Lets do it Canada, be a leader !!

Natural gas condensate

I am puzzled why we need to import condensate when we produce a huge amount of gas here in Canada. Can we not produce condensate here?