First Nation group furious at Province's move to cut trees down for Enbridge pipeline path

May 2012 photo of Yinka Dene Alliance

Geraldine Thomas-Flurer, a spokesperson for the Yinka Dene Alliance, vowed today to fight the BC government's moves toward granting Enbridge temporary land use permits to cut trees to gather data for the Northern Gateway pipeline, even before the pipeline has been approved.

Thomas-Flurer of the Saik'uz First Nation decried the absence of what she called "proper consultation" by the Province. 

“There's no way that the Yinka Dene Alliance is going to allow this to happen...we've put up signage on our territories and we're going to be practicing our Aboriginal rights, which we've practiced for a millennium. We're going to stop the people who are on the land who think they can just go out and act on temporary permits."

"We don't want the Province to approve any permits or do anything to advance the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline," she added.  "The Yinka Dene Alliance has said that we are going to be the wall that Enbridge has to go through, and we are adamant about that."

If the permits for the Nak'azdli First Nations territories are approved, they would allow Enbridge to undertake short-term occupation of the lands, construction of temporary access trails and removal of timber from the trails and occupation sites.

"The purpose of the program is to gather geotechnical data required to inform the design of the proposed pipeline," responded Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operation public officer Brennan Clarke in an email, relaying comments made on behalf of the ministry. He noted that Northern Gateway began efforts to engage First Nations in January 2013, and that the Saik'uz First Nations' traditional territory is not among the 33 sites affected by the survey.

Thomas-Flurer said that First Nations in BC were hunting, gathering and fishing on the land during this season, and that it would not allow any activity that would compromise these activities as the tar sands development did to Albertan First Nations. 

The Yinka Dene Alliance of First Nations issued a cease and desist letter to Enbridge in June against any any surveying of the Nak'azdli First Nations' land, saying that it would be viewed as trespassing. She said the public will be made aware if Enbridge began surveying the land based on permits that were not approved by the chiefs. 

"We don't own these lands. We have to take care of these lands for future generations. This is a responsibility we have as First Nations people and we take that very seriously.The world is watching. The United Nations is watching. People have to be mindful of that," Thomas-Flurer said.

The Saik'uz Nation, whose territory is near Vanderhoof, British Columbia, the Nak'azdli who are near Fort St. James, the Nadleh Whut'en near Fort Fraser and other First Nations affected by the pipeline have received up to hundred-page long referrals from Enbridge for "investigative field work activities" relating to Northern Gateway. 

While the Province hasn't explicitly given permission to Enbridge, a recent letter implies that Enbridge could be allowed to proceed if the First Nations involved don't make their way through the documents and respond by a certain date.

"We're extremely disappointed that the Province has elected to refer the development applications for the project on a piecemeal basis that does not allow for any consideration of the real concerns in relation to the larger project," Thomas-Flurer said.

Letter to "proceed to a decision" about temporary land use permits 

News of the threat of logging to make way for the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline reached the Nak'azdli First Nation last week via a letter from the government notifying them of an intent to "proceed to a decision" about controversial temporary land use permits given to Enbridge.  

The letter, dated July 23, demanded a response by 3 p.m., July 26. It noted in the first paragraph that the Province did reject the Northern Gateway proposal.  Then it went on to say that "given the uncertainty of the outcome of the federal review and decision making process, the Province is of the view that it is appropriate to limit the scope of consultation to the impacts of the Temporary use Permits."

But the Yinka Dene Alliance say consultation has been sorely inadequate. They say the BC government seems to treat the land use requests as being separate from Northern Gateway, when in fact the field work is part of the proposed pipeline. 

"The province keeps treating this as if it's two separate issues, which is ridiculous," Brenda Belak of West Coast Environmental Law said. 

"It's really obfuscation. There has been no decision on from the JRP yet.  If Enbridge is submitting further information, everyone should be able to see and respond to it, otherwise the process is not fair.  In fact, what they appear to be doing is proceeding with preparations for the pipeline before there has been an approval.”

Belak and Thomas-Flurer both said that under section 35 of the Constitution, the Canadian government has a duty to respect Aboriginal rights of First Nations affected by permits such as these.

Although they have requested to meet with the Premier before any permits are granted, no meeting has been scheduled to date and as of publication.

When contacted by The Vancouver Observer for a response to this article, a Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operation, representative wrote in an email: 

"Regardless of whether First Nations respond or not, the decision maker must consider all available, relevant information in making a decision to issue the permit or not. If no response is provided by a First Nation the province must consider available information with respect to potential impacts on First Nations rights and title."

"Consultation does not imply veto power."

Below, the letter (PDF available here): 

 

 

 

 

 Please support The Vancouver Observer's independent news coverage by becoming a member. 

 

More in Environment

Canada’s first land raised Atlantic salmon achieves top eco-ranking

Canada's first land-raised Atlantic salmon has achieved the top sustainability ranking issued by the world's leading independent eco-ranking program. KUTERRA Land Raised Atlantic salmon has received...

Coastal GasLink pipeline project granted environmental assessment approval

Natural Gas Development Minister Rich Coleman and Environment Minister Mary Polak issued an Environmental Assessment Certificate to Coastal GasLink Pipeline Ltd. for the Coastal GasLink Pipeline...
Ian McAllister tidal wolf photo - Great Bear Wild - used with permission

Great Bear Rainforest photographer urges a halt on tar sands oil

Spotting a pair of hungry wolves return to the same tidal spot on B.C.'s rainforest coast he's seen them come to for years, photographer Ian McAllister whipped into action: zipping up his dry suit,...

Comments

Enbridge Pipeline

So what do people have to do now?  Do we have to put our lives on the line?  This is serious business

Hi Davood, 

Thank you for commenting. To clarify, it is about temporary land use permits, and as mentioned the Province has not granted this yet. The Yinka Dene Alliance's main concern is that the most recent letter to the Nak'azdli implies that the decision-maker could make the call to grant (or not) temporary land use permits, and in their view, this decision -- being related to Northern Gateway -- should not go ahead without consent and a meeting with the Premier.

permit for pipeline

Is anyone sharing this information with the CBC, CTV or global news stations?  This is outrageous and needs much more attention than it's getting.

Liberal Hypocrites

Just another example of the lying Liberals talking out of both sides of their derrieres!  Did anyone REALLY think that Enbridge was dead if the Liberals got re-elected??? Wake up and smell the tar sands people...

Pipeline

Too bad she got into power.  I'll be glad when we get a premier from the Green Party.  Its all about the money, while the environment gets destroyed, ecosystems polluted, species lost and green spaces disappear.

Quebec is a reminder what happens when these products move through our communities.  Lets see what happens when these pipelines have an accident.

 

Oil Spill Waiting to Happen

Enbridge's piple line will lead to an oil spill waiting to happen, because there is 70 miles of waterways from Kitimat to the open sea, so it is very easy for a tanker hit a rock in this 70 mile inlet and cove. There will be no Exxon Valdez's in the coastal waters of British Columbia. Enbridge, dump your tar sands else where.

Northern Gaff

There will be NO norther gateway NO matter what JRP has to say. So for insipid Enbridge to try to make it defacto will only lead  to confrontation of innocent people on both sides - if you work for Enbridge, use your head and find another job, you will never have one here. CHOKE THE TARSANDS! IDLE NO MORE!

 

Yinka Dene Alliance

Hi Jenny,

Does your comment mean that The Yinka Dene Alliance are supposed to be consulted with, prior to taking decision on clearing the pipeline project, and that the alliance is afraid teh BC govt might go ahead without consulting with them?

If there a way one could get in touch with the alliance?

Thanks.

Say no to these carbon brothers

Thanks to the First Nations for pursuing this suit and the VO for covering it.  How preposterous -- Enbridge should have permission to pre-ruin this particular land in the event that more rational minds fail to prevail and Enbridge and their brothers-in-carbon are allowed to ruin the entire planet?

Yinka Dene Alliance

First Nations people, do not grant Enbridge access to your lands. And don't forget to keep an eye on David Black who wants to build his own pipeline and build an oil refinery near Lakelse Lake, all financed by the Communist Chinese who don't give a crap about protecting our environment.

People first

Maybe if this society started putting people before animals and trees and their right to this or that some of these issues would be much easier to resolve  

Is this Christy Clark's way of doing an end-run around her so-called 5 point criteria for approving the pipeline? It looks and smells suspicious. First Nations are right to be "furious" - so should we.

Concerns

Tony Mitra wrote:

Hi Jenny,

Does your comment mean that The Yinka Dene Alliance are supposed to be consulted with, prior to taking decision on clearing the pipeline project, and that the alliance is afraid teh BC govt might go ahead without consulting with them?

If there a way one could get in touch with the alliance?

Thanks.

Hi Tony, 

Specifically, the individual nations on whose territory Enbridge is asking for land permits are supposed to be consulted. As the letter mentions, the Province is legally required to consult the chiefs, but not the alliance. That said, the Nak'azdli, the Saik'uz (who Enbridge allegedly did send documents to), and Nadleh Whut'en are part of the Yinka Dene Alliance, who have specifically formed an alliance to oppose the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline, so it's related. Their concerns (both the Yinka Dene Alliance and individual nations) as I understand it are:

1) that the Province's letter basically says it is reasonable to grant Enbridge permission for temporary land use for the data-gathering, so unless we hear back by July 26, these may be granted.

2) that the letters imply that Enbridge's field work on the First Nations' traditional territory has nothing to do with the Northern Gateway pipeline, when in fact is it data-gathering for the pipeline. 

If there are any corrections to this, please note in the comments.

As for the Alliance, their website and contact details are here http://yinkadene.ca/

Thank you again, 
JU

 

Province Obviously in Suport of Enbridge

When a Provincial government issues permits ahead of an environmental study it has one meaning. The project as for as they are concerned is a go.

Hello I am so grateful I found your website, I really found you by mistake, while I was browsing on Bing for something else, Anyhow I am here now and would just like to say cheers for a remarkable post and a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don't have time to read through it all at the minute but I have saved it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the excellent work. My website ... แทงบอลออนไลน์
Official Factory Unlock for AT&T iPhone is kind of like getting the shackles off of your cellular freedom. While iPhones are indeed mobile, the true mobility of your own standard allowed use of them is not. Different contracts will certainly give you different limitations and privileges on the amount of data you can send and receive, where there is rarely any power to bridge the space between your allowances of two different services once your device is already contracted to 1; this may be changed Official Factory Unlock for AT&T iPhone ATT unlock iPhone 3GS Are you seeking the easiest and safest methods to unlock iphone 5s without difficulty? If so, you have heard about the unlimited benefits of unlocking your Apple iPhone. You can easily make use of more than a few effective ways available to carry out your desires. You can easily make use of greater than a few effective ways available to carry out your desires, If so, you have heard about the unlimited benefits of unlocking your Apple iPhone. But, you need to keep focus on everything from the beginning to end. This ATT unlock iPhone 3GS is a result of a lot of reasons like individuals who do not have the most effective knowledge from the most modern techniques and tools failed to obtain the most expected outcome from iphone 5s unlocking and subsequently find more troubles like breakdown of iPhone. Whenever you like to unlock your phone to be able to operate your through different carriers aside from its authorized carrier, you have to give focus to favorable methods of to complete jailbreak iPhone and after that get benefits from ATT unlock iPhone 3GSiPhone. This really is beneficial to do something wisely on the appointed time.

There's a misunderstanding on

There's a misunderstanding on what 'consultation' means - it's stakeholder status not landowner status.

Courts have repeatedly emphasized there is a right to be consulted and that this is not a veto.

Thus it's inappropriate to refer to 'their' land - they have the right to a say, not a right to control.

It's not really that difficult.

I don't support Enbridge on this as I do think they've done a terrible job on presenting their case including on aboriginal consultation but for the 1000th time - it's not a right of veto and engaging in hyperbole doesn't advance the discussion.