Skip to Content

New life for unused parking lots

Read More:
« prevnext »
Photo by Graham Anderson

 I look out the window each day to a sea of concrete. One full city block, 72 parking spaces, always empty. I’ve been studying at SFU Harbour Centre in Downtown Vancouver for the last few months. From our third floor classroom I see that the large parking garage next door is never close to full. Nearby lots are the same, with many floors of empty space, hundreds of empty parking stalls, even during peak weekday hours.

Vancouver Councilor Geoff Meggs confirms that half-empty lots are part of a larger trend in downtown parking. Easypark, the city-owned parking management company, has seen a dramatic 20% drop in revenues since the Canada Line was built, a trend Councilor Meggs attributes to changing travel patterns:

 

“It’s not just an economic downturn, it’s a fundamental shift because of increased investments in rapid transit,” says Meggs.

Jerry Dobrovolny, the city’s Director of Transportation, works out of a corner office in the Crossroads building at Cambie and Broadway. His desk overlooks False Creek, the downtown peninsula, the North Shore mountains, and the Cambie Bridge. From this perspective, he sees the impact of shifting travel patterns on a daily basis.

“I’ve never seen the bridge backed up,” he says.

Dobrovolny also notes the falling occupancy rates at downtown parkades, and adds: “That’s because of the success of the Canada Line.”

City statistics show that Vancouverites are increasingly choosing transportation alternatives like transit, cycling, and walking, with the number of people driving downtown decreasing every year for the last 15 years.

As we drive less, pollution diminishes, air quality for the region improves, and travel times for commuters decrease.

It also has created a plethora of empty and under-utilized parking space in the downtown core, about 7,000 empty spaces across downtown. The cumulative area of these parking stalls adds up to 10.5 hectares, more than double the footprint of BC Place, equivalent to nearly 3% of the land in the downtown area.

Councillor Meggs sees this as an “opportunity for transformation. It’s really like maintaining stables for horses or buggies right now, given that we see the shift coming with climate change.”

Meggs would like to see some parkades converted into “more sustainable, more future-oriented developments.”

“When you consider the amount of space in the city network that’s allocated for cars and their storage, while people continue to sleep on the sidewalks, we could do a lot more with that [space],” says Meggs.

Housing Solutions

One new development offering creative solutions to housing issues in Vancouver challenges conventional wisdom about parking.

At 60 West Cordova Street, the developer Westbank has partnered with Vancity and Gregory Henriquez architects to provide affordable ownership housing in downtown Vancouver. The condos start at $219,900, with priority for those who live or work in the downtown eastside.

The innovative project has reduced construction costs in part by building minimal parking for its residents.

The surface lot with its generally empty 50 vehicle spaces will be replaced with 108 units of affordable housing. 60 W Cordova took advantage of a new credit system that was designed to help Vancouver reach its ‘Greenest City’ goals. It allows developers to build less parking if they can provide reasonable alternatives, such as transit and carsharing, to occupants.

The result will be an increase in neighborhood density and a net decrease in parking supply.

According to Dobrovolny, this development has been made possible by recent policy changes that allow developers to build less parking.

Generally, the city asks developers to design buildings so that occupants’ parking needs are accommodated on site. But Vancouver’s current transportation plan has capped downtown parking at 1997 levels.

To maintain this level of supply as the downtown area grows, minimum parking requirements for new developments have been reduced over time.

“We get larger buildings with the same number of stalls or less stalls,” explains Dobrovolny. “The total doesn’t change.”

Development and the Market Response

(7) Comments

Scott Dawson March 14th 2011 | 10:10 AM

Hi Graham,

Great article. Just a heads up you spelled "Vancouver" wrong in the title.

Cheers!

Scott Dawson March 14th 2011 | 10:10 AM

Hi Graham,

Great article. Just a heads up you spelled "Vancouver" wrong in the title.

Cheers!

jenni March 14th 2011 | 10:10 AM

"At 60 West Cordova Street, the developer Westbank has partnered with Vancity and Gregory Henriquez architects to provide affordable ownership housing in downtown Vancouver. The condos start at $219,900, with priority for those who live or work in the downtown eastside."

for the record this "affordable ownership" was for marketing - it will be full of wealthy professionals who got a steal on their places including as a man who bought 2 units on the top floor which he is turning into one very large, very expensive unit.

Rob Grant March 15th 2011 | 9:09 AM

Enjoyed your article Graham.

In the borough of Manhattan the requirement for parking in any new development is waived. I've seen plans for a number of very expensive condo developments there without any parking spaces. This also allows for small lots which would be very difficult to develop with Vancouver's parking bylaw, to be developed with relatively small innovative buildings.

I think if you looked at parking requirements for many European cities, including cities such as London, you will find little in the way of requirements for parking for new buildings, but rather restrictions on how many parkng stalls can be built.

It's good to see that the conflict between City policy, discouraging auto use while regulations require that every new residential unit provide an off-street parking space, is finally being addressed here.

Big Moo March 19th 2011 | 11:11 AM

Hi Graham: I really enjoyed this article. Thanks for doing it.

I note that the spectacular new Telus complex will result in two large parking lots going down, but it is not clear how much underground parking will be built there.

D March 23rd 2011 | 2:14 PM

How is it that Vancouver, trying to become the 'greenest city in the world' requires parking at all?  Why not let the market sort out the balance between cost of provision and marketability?  Requiring developments to provide a minimum number of parking spaces seems like a spurious mix of interference in the market and completely at odds with the policy objective of reducing vehicle trips - these regulation should displease people on all sides of the political spectrum.

Pragmatist May 13th 2011 | 12:00 AM

This article is typical of the 25-30 year old generation. Lots of ideas and plans that are all theoretical and have little place in the real world. And yes, they would rebut about being part of a "shift", not realizing it is very well a destructive shift.