Skip to Content

Striptease in "Vegas North"

Read More:
« prevnext »

Madonna as Strip Tease artist.  Publicity photo.

Some people assume that learning about history is a boring exercise focused on memorizing names and dates that famous men did famous things. But Becki Ross’ entertaining and engaging new book Burlesque West: Showgirls, Sex and Sin in Postwar Vancouver blows this assumption out of the water, as well as other popularly held beliefs about striptease, morality, and the image of Vancouver itself.

Ross is Chair of the Women's and Gender Studies Undergraduate Program at UBC and the book is a culmination of 11 years of research, including 50 first-person interviews with dancers, club-owners, booking agents, and others involved in the business of striptease and burlesque in Vancouver. Her book and the stories of her narrators have a lot to say about Vancouver.

In an interview earlier this week, Ross said that she started her project out of a personal affinity with rebellious women and because “there was a very large gap in the history about Vancouver.” She pointed out how many histories were written about the men working in the resource industries at the time, while none had been created about the women who provided erotic entertainment for those men.

“A general cultural cover-up was going on,” Ross told me, pointing as an example to the accepted history of the fairgrounds at the Pacific National Exhibition, where dancers in “girlie shows” provided erotic entertainment for visitors until the 1970s. “There have been two official histories written about the PNE,” says Ross, “and neither mentioned the girlie shows.”

Burlesque West paints a vivid picture of the from 1945 to 1980 when Vancouver’s striptease and burlesque scene was flourishing as a result of a local gender imbalance (male resource workers significantly outnumbered women in Vancouver), geographic proximity to Las Vegas which led to it's nickname "Vegas North", favourable working conditions for dancers, who could make two to three times as much as women in other sectors, and restrictive liquor licensing that increased the illicit allure of the nightclubs. “The acts included some of the biggest names from the States,” says Ross, “Tempest Storm, Gypsy Rose Lee, and Lili St. Cyr all performed in Vancouver.”  She also outlines the diversity of the industry, challenging an assumption that dancers fit into a certain type:

“There were white dancers and dancers of colour, large and small dancers, young and older dancers, dancers from low-income & middle-class families; dancers who were mothers; a deaf dancer, lesbian & bisexual dancers, male to female transsexuals,” Ross says. Reading Burlesque West reveals dancer and club owners’ diverse experiences and how issues like racial stratification and geography (East vs. West-side clubs) shaped their performances. You’ll also hear incredible stories about dancers’ lives and performances, including incredible gimmicks such as one dancer who had a trained parrot who flew around the stage plucking off articles of clothing.

Ross also challenges the tendency to ignore the reality of striptease and burlesque as labour. Her book contains a thorough analysis of the benefits and hazards dancers faced in their employment. She found that dancers saw themselves as artists, innovators, and risk-takers, resisting the stereotypes and stigma levelled at them by police, policy-makers and the general public, many of whom saw them as “menace to the stability and health of the nation.”

But despite the stigma, dancers and the striptease industry had a huge economic impact. “Striptease greased the city’s economic engine,” argues Ross. “It was an extremely viable industry that employed thousands – not just dancers and managers but also costumes, makeup, musicians, cops to enforce liquor and morality laws, and attorneys to defend against charges.”

However, Ross contends the important economic and social role of striptease and burlesque in Vancouver has often been deliberately overlooked out of fear it might tarnish the history of Vancouver and its image as a “clean, spanking, upwardly mobile space.”

(2) Comments

kathieace November 4th 2009 | 9:09 AM
Hello Becki, When sharing stories for the world, I think it is important to know, first of all, who you are and to understand your own history so you can determine whether your stories are coming from your wounding or from your healing. Women who take their clothes off in front of a room full of strange men are not acting from free choice and certainly not acting as “sexual rebels and non-conformists”. Where does your authority come from in sharing such information? Have you yourself done this in your own life? I shudder to think of the influence you have with young women in your position as the Chair of the Women's and Gender Studies Undergraduate Program at UBC. It is important to be aware of the power you carry and so to be sure that you are not distorting truth, especially for your own ego needs. Trivializing and presenting acts of violence against women as frivolous fun or as freely chosen labour, on the part of the most abused and most vulnerable people in our society, makes this world even more unsafe for all women. It is what leads to real violence against real women like in this YouTube: Dreamworlds 3: Desire, Sex & Power in Music Video 800,000 women and children are trafficked into the global prostitution industry every year. To presume to speak for these suffering women who have no voice, and to profit from doing so, is unconscionable. cc Gillian Creese Director CENTRE FOR WOMEN’S AND GENDER STUDIES e-mail wmst1@interchange.ubc.ca Kathie Wallace kathieace@lycos.com
Hyok Kim January 2nd 2010 | 8:08 AM
Dear Kathie, Your note makes me so angry I cannot see straight. First of all, have you read Dr. Becki Ross' book? If you had, you would have realized that this book is first and foremost a historical timeline of our legacy as women and laborers, forgotten in the recording of hetero-normative, white, privileged memory. I question, what do you know about the voices of what you label those who had no capacity to "choose"? How dare you render those who are not as privileged as yourself children, and deny them their own agency of choice and consent? You remind me of the books I read as a small child that informed me white men discovered my country and my province. You remind me of the teachers that taught white history. You remind me of the white feminists I could not relate to because you unabashedly presumed to speak for me, a woman of color, about how I was oppressed though you knew nothing about being a woman of color and my experience being oppressed by women like you. You sound just like a Christian, bible-thumping evangelical on some warped sound loop. Get educated, discover yourself, because you have much more in common with a judgmental, white middle-class man than you do with those you presume to speak for. Kim Hyok Kimhyok@yahoo.ca