Skip to Content
feminista.v5 copy.png

Burlesque and feminism: It's complicated

Read More:

YouTube video of Delilah Dare strutting her stuff at Kitty Nights. Inset photo of burlesque legend Burgundy Brixx (in blue feathers) by Brendan Lally on Flickr.

I’ve always felt I would like burlesque, just like all the feminists I know. But, living in Vancouver, a city spellbound by burlesque’s razzle-dazzle, it didn’t take me long to discover that my initial feelings were wrong.

It’s awkward to say it, but despite the burlesque scene’s talk of empowerment and female liberation, I’ve only ever felt the opposite. I’ve wondered, am I just “not getting it”? Are my negative reactions to the burlesque I’ve been exposed to in Vancouver valid?

If they are valid, is the relationship between burlesque and feminism a lot more complicated than people think?

Diamonds are a girl's best friend

Delilah Dare is the resident dirty blonde of Nicky Ninedoor’s local troupe Pandora and the Locksmiths. She told The Vancouver Observer over email that burlesque relates to feminist women for a number of reasons, the first being that it allows women to feel good about themselves.

“It embraces women who are not present in mainstream representations of female sexuality and beauty, thereby providing a counter narrative [to today’s beauty norms],” she wrote.

Certainly, broadening beauty ideals can have a real impact on the lived reality of Vancouver women — for instance, in promoting a wider range of clothing size options.

Dare also wrote that burlesque is one of those rare artistic spaces led mostly by women. “There is still room for men, but they have to take a back seat to the women.”

Bobbi Whiskey, a performer who’s tread the boards for four years, agreed that burlesque, despite its makeup of sexy ladies and striptease, is primarily a women’s space.

“It gives women a chance to bond over something that we not only enjoy and work very hard at, but are also quite emotionally invested in,” she said. “I think that is hard to find in this world, a place where we are not pressured to compete with one another.”

Photo of Sex At The Circus Burlesque by Brendan Lally.

Whiskey understands why some feminists are uncomfortable with yet another medium that requires women to take it off, jewel-encrusted thongs and pasties notwithstanding.

However, she also thinks that people who feel averse to the idea might not be looking at the big picture.

“You can't possibly imagine how powerful and in touch with themselves a performer becomes when they're on stage unless you've felt it,” Whiskey insisted. “And that's what we are: performers. We're dancers, actors and comedians rolled in to one. The majority of our audience sees art when they're watching a show, not ‘stripping’.”

Fleeting power

Yet, Dare responded to the concern that burlesque can adversely affect feminism differently than Whiskey. For one, she acknowledged that the art form in Vancouver has become capitalist.

“Performers as well as producers have to do what audiences want in order to make money, which can lead them to fall into ideals [that are] marketable,” Dare wrote.

She also said that we live in a patriarchy, and that, “Women dancing on stage naked can be taken as objectifying.”

Laurie Penny of The Guardian is an ex-burlesque performer, and she has written about her experiences on the bump 'n' grind circuit many times before. In a 2009 article, “Burlesque laid bare,” she confesses that the burlesque world made her feel anything but in touch with herself.

The burlesque striptease makes explicit what push-up-bras and sticky lipgloss only promise: a passive, faux-naive, peek-a-boo sexuality that has little to do with real female pleasure and everything to do with mimicking whatever we are told is “sexy”. Sexual explicitness does no harm to young women if it is ­combined with honesty, but burlesque has little to do with sexual honesty. It is part and parcel of the packaging of female desire, a process by which young women trade in their sexuality and their selfhood for whatever fleeting power they can grasp.

The article also explained how burlesque has steadily shaken off its antecedent political objectives, like so much gold body glitter. While in the 19th-century it was a form of theatre the working classes used to parody the cultural hang-ups of high society — women dressing up as men, for instance — decades later, women's bodies are now used to “help sell the art form to dwindling audiences.”

Penny insists most burlesque is now naught but “misogyny in a tasteful package of feathers”.

Co-opting feminist rhetoric

Ariana Barer thinks burlesque needs to really invest itself in subversion for it to operate within a framework of feminism. She has debated burlesque's connection to feminism with her peers at The F Word radio show, ever since a disappointing exposure to the Vancouver scene.

“If it presented challenges to gender norms like women in strap-ons, or women menstruating, or over-the-top representations of masculinity and femininity,” she told me, “then it could be like drag and call attention to the constructed nature of gender roles, while still being funny or entertaining or sexy.”

“I have also heard of genres of burlesque like gore-lesque that interrupt the viewers’ pleasure of consuming nudity by including lots of blood and guts.”

These more extreme modes of communication are what Barer thinks is necessary for burlesque to justify the scene's frequent use of feminist rhetoric – words like “empowerment”. Otherwise, it's merely co-opting.

After all, women taking their clothes off is not seen as “unlady-like” anymore. Instead, it's what women are expected to do.

“What does empowerment mean in this context? Does it ask us to just go along for the ride, smile, and participate in our own objectification?” Barer asked. “Choice isn't a fabulous feminist ideal in and of itself when the options we're expected to choose from aren't ideal.”

“Buying into the same heterosexual male fantasy of sexiness just makes everyone feel like they can belong in it if they buy the right book, classes, lingerie, heels, feathers, pasties, and glitter. Choose plastic surgery, feel empowered. Choose this cardio strip class, feel empowered.”

There seems to be an unwillingness to look critically at many of society's guilty pleasures. Indeed, more than two burlesque performers who agreed to talk to the VO about the art form's relationship with feminism backed out upon screening the interview questions.

Photo of unnamed local performers by Christopher Porter on Flickr.

Is the medium the message?

What Barer finally stressed was that burlesque seems to have splintered into two disciplines since its inception: the alternative, more underground kind of burlesque, which stays true to its roots of political and social commentary – the kind that is much harder to find – and also a more mainstream kind of burlesque.

This mainstream strand is more interested in titillating audiences than making statements, and its representatives are generally white, cis-gendered, able-bodied, and the otherwise conventionally attractive.

For example, the representatives of the ever-popular Vancouver International Burlesque Festival almost uniformly fit these criteria, despite the medium's history for including queer, racial, or differently-abled identities.

This lack of interest in intersectionality can lead to the popularity of very problematic performances – the Opium Den Show by burlesque queen Dita Von Teese, for one.

It's also worth noting that the current president of the VIBF is Blue Morris, one of Lotusland’s only male burlesque dancers. Previously, he has said on his blog, “It's important that burlesque remain primarily in the control of women or the art form could change drastically.”

At the end of the day, like in all forms of expression, it's the movers and shakers who determine what kind of dialogue occurs when the lights go on, as well as the subjectivity of each spectator.

As put by Delilah Dare, “Burlesque is not inherently feminist, no more than writing is, drawing is, or blogging is. Each is a medium, but each can be used to make a feminist message.”

(5) Comments

Trixie Hobbitses August 22nd 2012 | 8:20 PM

This article and its author disappoints me. Who are you to tell other women what to find empowering? Bringing other women down, burlesque dancers or no, is inherently anti-feminist. You do what you feel is right for you. Please don't look down your nose at me.

Naima August 23rd 2012 | 12:12 PM

Sorry to Trixie but I think the author's just bringing up what a lot of girls think. She's not looking down on anyone, she's just saying that burlesque is walking a fine line between objectification and empowerment. She's not bashing burlesque at all, if you read the positive statements about it. 

ConnieCahoots August 24th 2012 | 12:00 AM

The argument as to whether burlesque is feminist or not is as old as the day is long. I have been doing this art form for quite awhile; almost 8 years. I too had these same questions when I first began. I was in my early 20s, had read my share of feminist literature (go bell hooks!) and had a dialogue with myself as to whether my actions were feminist or not. Was I operating within my comfort zone?

After my first performance that dialogue quickly waned. I do burlesque cuz it's fun! I get to sing and dance and make people laugh. I have done burlesque while in drag, while prentending to wax my pubic hair off, and also while being plain sexy.  And I always choose to operate within my comfort zone.

I have also had the  amazing opportunity to perform with many male burlesque dancers or "Boylesquers" as they are called. They are valuable to this scene. It is so great to bond with men who have the same passion for this art form.

My only argument against burlesque is that I wish I was able to make a decent income from it- I am working on that btw because I deserve that. I do put alot of time, attention and detail into my work.

Don't get me wrong- I do not think the issue of feminism and burlesque is not important. If woman (or men) need to have to have this conversation, by all means do.

I only hope that some day, as a society, we take the same amount of attention we put into how women express themselves, discerning whether it is good or bad, into ensuring that all women in our culture have access to food, education and housing; thereby enabling them to do anything they damn well please:).

Lady Jack August 24th 2012 | 10:10 AM

I am a cabaret and burlesque performer in Chicago...I'm also a performance artist and dancer, model and actor. I perform in both what is thought of as the boundary-pushing underground burlesque and what would be considered the commercialized version. and I would say there is plenty of both. I have performance art pieces that are labeled burlesque in burlesque shows, and labeled performance art and dance in TED conferences. The questions posed in the article are ones that I grapple with, yet there is no denying that whatever I do I come from a place of feminism, narrative structure, and communication of self. I make my living performing and modeling and I am bound to find myself in gigs that jive with my worldview, and some that do not, and that can be a difficult ethical balance. I've performed at clubs where the management just thinks "pretty showgirl", women look angry, polite men shyly look away, then they come up to me after and say..."What was that? I loved it, it's beautiful, it's different, it's art."  But it's totally ok, to just simply not like burlesque, just like it's ok to not like acid jazz or yodeling.

I see performances that make me feel like burlesque is objectification. The audience is leering, the performer is shy and awkward. To a certain extent I feel it often is less about a fundamental concept of "Is this anti-feminist" and more about perhaps the performer is simply not skilled enough to convey the message that is in her mind. In theatre when that happens its bad theatre...in burlesque it's a leap off the art cliff "Oh no, it's really not even performance art is it? It's not even art! It's stripping, stripping is wrong!" It's interesting to me that "gore burlesque" is cited as an example of making burlesque OK...because there are actually many people that directly find that sexy and arousing. And the comment speaks to the idea that being straightforwardly "sexy" completely nulls out artistry, an idea that I think can end up limiting expression.  

A little less than a year ago I wrote, co-produced and acted in a dark comedy/action web series called Hitwomen, and the fan response made me feel way more objectified than anything I've done in burlesque. Many messages...when will you start wearing heels and stockings, when can I get a spanking from you, please more scenes of humiliation. Those messages were out of place, aggressive and felt deeply objectifying in the true sense of the word. Does that mean action films objectify women?

Burlesque is far too broad of a word now to say is IT feminist or not. It's both and I loved that quote at the end of the article. It also encompasses more than striptease in many shows around the country, and there are still shows that approach it as political satire now that don't even incorporate striptease. And there is burlesque striptease in other variety shows that are not "burlesque shows." It is a difficult semantics issue. To further complicate it, there are many people like me that ride a genre line, creating pieces that have no striptease, dance...clown...yet embrace a very similar aesthetic...or use strip as a metaphor or narrative device vs "striptease" in addition to pure striptease performance. I still look at a much of burlesque in performance and in marketing and think...this doesn't represent me, and sometimes even actively offends me with the message it conveys. BOTH within the commercialized and the underground worlds. I think discussion is really important and I believe the genre needs to be honest with itself and also allow for more seperation of styles.

enodiamond August 28th 2012 | 12:00 AM

the type of burlesque you're saying is rare and hard to find isn't as such at all.  We are part of a nationally touring company that performs about 100 gigs a year from coast to coast.  We feature women wearing penises, menstruating jesus, sex dolls peeing on the reverend fred phelps, a 350 pound male stripper.  I chuckled a bit at some of the things you wrote you'd like to see and we've been doing it for about 7 years now.

Menstruating jesus (with a bukkake intro):  https://vimeo.com/42801965

Peeing on fred phelps: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ybWHAPweMU&feature=youtu.be

I can't find video of the girls wearing penises right now but we've done it a few different ways...