BC pension fund invests in companies contributing to climate change

Flooding of the Long Island Railroad train yard in photo above.

British Columbia Investment Management Corporation’s (bcIMC) prides itself on its support for principles of responsible investment and, as signatory to the United Nations Environmental Programme’s Declaration on Climate Change, appears particularly concerned about climate change.

The UN declaration states that, without immediate action, climate change will cause extreme weather events, drought, crop failure and disease, and that these impacts will fall most harshly on the world’s poor. In accordance with these goals, bcIMC has called on federal Environment Minister Peter Kent to institute a carbon tax.

Yet bcIMC is invested across the board in fossil fuel companies, many of them the most controversial and destructive companies in the province and nation. These companies mine and transport the oil sands, frack for natural gas, and mine and transport coal.

Investing in catastrophe

bcIMC holds stock in at least eighteen of the oil sands’ major players, including Sinopec (“the Khomenist regime’s lifeline to a nuclear bomb” according to Terry Glavin in the National Post) and ExxonMobil (a major funder of climate denier groups).

It also holds stock in controversial pipeline companies:

bcIMC’s coal holdings include stocks in coal companies such as Arch Coal and China Coal Energy, two of the world’s top coal producers. Coal has the highest greenhouse gas emissions per unit of energy of all fossil fuels and there is enough economically available coal to trigger run away climate change.

bcIMC also invests in coal terminals, such as Jimmy Pattison’s Westshore Terminals, which shipped 27.3 million tons of coal in 2011, enough to create the same amount of carbon dioxide that BC gives off in burning all its fossil fuels combined. As the US divests from coal, terminals that can ship coal to Asia are seen a necessary link to Asian markets. Thanks to coal terminals, coal companies get the profits they need, Asia burns one of the world’s most climate disrupting fuels, and Northwest residents get toxic dust. As a matter of conscience, Nobel Prize laureate and SFU Economics Professor Mark Jaccard and 12 others blocked a train headed for this terminal last May.

bcIMC owns many natural gas company stocks, including companies such as AGL and Apache that use fracking. Hydraulic fracturing injects millions of litres of water and thousands of liters of unidentified chemicals underground at high pressure to release natural gas from shale rock formations. The Council of Canadians opposes it because of its high water use, its high carbon emissions, its impacts on human health, the disruption to wildlife and the danger it poses to ground water and local drinking water. 

bcIMC’s Kern Energy private equity funds, meanwhile, cover all the dirty energy sectors: rail transport of oil sands, North Sea oil and gas development, oil sands development, natural gas exploration and development of coal bed methane.

Betting against climate stability

More in Earth Matters

What to do when the IPCC gets you down

There's only so much end of the world you can take. Here's what you can do about it.

Learning the language of climate solutions

If someone had told me how hard learning another language was I wouldn't have tried.

Failure not an option for climate movement

Saying the climate movement is a failure and we should give up is not an option.
Speak up about this article on Facebook or Twitter. Do this by liking Vancouver Observer on Facebook or following us @Vanobserver on Twitter. We'd love to hear from you.


Naturally this fund is invested in assets that cause climate change. Emissions cause climate change and it is impossible for any reasonable fund to not invest in assets that cause substatial emissions. The real questions are

1) are they underweight these assets in their portfolio compared to others or use a similar method to reduce exposure 

2) do they have a low carbon hedging strategy so that when the carbon crash comes they are better off that most others.

3) do they have a complete strategy to disclose and manage climate risks?

see as to what we really need from these funds in order to limit climate risk.

and if you are a member / client of this fund then goto to help change their behaviour and to  rate them.

Julian Poulter, AODP.

BC pension investment

It is not in the interest of anyone who lives in B.C. and owns property here to have our pension funds invested in companies like tar sands that will destroy B.C.'s natural beauty, wildlife and people.  The value of our property would plummet as a result of these disastrous undertakings, making us poorer in retirement, not wealthier.