Magical moments in Vancouver cycling in 2010
Photo courtesy of Paul Krueger
2010 was a watershed year in Vancouver cycling history – thanks to a Mayor and City Council that actively promoted cycling, and to many cycling activists pursuing their shared dream of safe cycling for all. Mayor Gregor Robertson stood up for cyclists, and spearheaded essential improvements to cycling infrastructure that have made cycling in Vancouver safer and more accessible. October 5th was the day that Vancouver City Council voted unanimously for the contentious separated bike lane on Hornby Street.

(Photo by Average Joe Cyclist)
Workers were out the next morning, and the lane was completed at record speed, to open (unofficially) on 7th December. The entire Bike Lane can be seen on the video at the bottom of this post. (Video by Alexwarrior1.)
It’s a great bike lane, and a pleasure to ride. It does have its dangerous bits, such as the sections where motorists need to cross the lane to get into car parks. On my very first ride on the lane, I was rudely cut off by someone on an urgent mission to park his van. However, the Council has made great efforts to keep the lane safe – it even features Vancouver’s first bike traffic signals.

(Photo courtesy of Paul Krueger)
But it’s not just a bike lane. While it may be just one small step for bike infrastructure, it is also one giant leap for the development of Vancouver as a true 21st century city – one that focuses on finding sustainable alternatives to current systems that patently are failing.
We know that the number of people wanting to travel into Vancouver will just continue to grow – the city is expected to grow by another 23% by 2041. And we know the streets cannot get any bigger, even though most are already gridlocked half the time. And we also know that continuing to do the same thing even though it has patently failed, is the definition of stupidity. Hence the Vision Vancouver commitment to supporting transportation alternatives that have the potential to absorb the growing numbers – such as bicycles. Surveys show that 60% of residents would cycle downtown if it was safe.
So making cycling safer is arguably the single most important step towards solving Vancouver’s transportation problems and making the city sustainable.
Gordon Price said it best when he addressed the Council prior to the historic vote. Comparing the Hornby Bike Lane to the completion of the Stanley Park Seawall, he said that there are times in the building of the infrastructure of a city when “things just go click.” Approving the Hornby Bike Lane would be one of those:
“Click moments – magical moments. This is powerful stuff; it changes how people perceive space, how they move – and even the identity of the city.”
Vancouver’s identity may well be said to have evolved with the recent addition of several major improvements in cycling infrastructure:
- the fabulous Central Valley Greenway (June 2009, with the collaboration of the Cities of Burnaby and New Westminster);
- the Burrard Bridge Separated Bike Lane (July 2009);
- the Dunsmuir Street Separated Bike Lane (March 2010); and
- the Hornby Street Separated Bike Lane (December 2010).
And that's not even all. On Dunsmuir, green bike boxes have magically appeared. On the 10th Avenue bike route, the desperately needed traffic light for crossing Fraser finally sprang up. On Commercial Drive, a bike corral for parking appeared seemingly overnight. And so quite suddenly, most major trips around Vancouver can now be planned as bike trips – safely. At the beginning of last year, it took all my courage to cycle through the city of Vancouver; now, it’s almost like a ride in the park.

The new Dunsmuir Street Separated Bike Lane, complete with green boxes (Photo courtesy of Paul Krueger)
All of this is not only thanks to Mayor Robertson and Vision Vancouver – there is a small army of volunteers who have worked to make this happen, notably members of the VACC (Vancouver Area Cycling Coalition) and the BCCC (British Columbia Cycling Coalition). The VACC has pursued its mission to make cycling an integral part of the transportation culture by stanchly promoted cycling in rain and sun – such as by hosting Bike to Work Weeks in all conditions, including the downpours in November during the fall Bike to Work Week.
Monsoon-like rain did not stop a steady procession of cyclists from stopping at the VACC’s Bike to Work Week station at Gilmore, where volunteers huddled under tents that threatened to fly away at any second.
(Photo by Average Joe Cyclist)
As a direct result of infrastructure improvements and volunteer efforts, the increase in bike trips has already begun. For example, on 7th July 2010, the one millionth cyclist crossed the Burrard bridge bike lane – just shy of a year after it opened. Mayor Robertson commented:
“This is a remarkable achievement. Over one million riders in less than a year shows that when you build safe, protected bike lanes, people of all ages will come out and use them. The Burrard Bridge bike lanes have been a big success and helped make cycling and walking over the bridge safer for thousands of people every day. Before the bike lanes were in place, only the most dedicated cyclists used Burrard Bridge. Now it’s become a popular route for families, seniors, kids – it’s a safe and fun way to get into downtown or head towards Kits beach.”
Making cycling safe for all is a giant leap towards integrating cycling into the mainstream transportation culture, and thereby helping to create sustainable cities. Our city seems to have passed an important milestone in the process of growing into a mature, forward-thinking city – a city in which we the residents can hope to see our city go from strength to strength in the 21st century.
Proponents of cycling have stood their ground against the small but very vocal minority of business people who apparently would prefer to see cyclists exposed to danger, rather than give up a paltry 158 parking spots close to their businesses. The hysterical resistance to the Hornby Bike Lane was truly extraordinary, and was spearheaded by Laura Jones of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business. One of her most brilliant suggestions was to paint the existing (and very dangerous) Hornby Bike Lane green, to make it safer for cyclists. Now tell me, if the embattled lane this guy was cycling on was painted green, how on earth would that have made him safer?

Brave cyclist on the previously unprotected Hornby bike lane contends with fast-moving cars invading from every side. (Photo by Average Joe Cyclist)
Mainstream media unsurprisingly gave a lot more air time to big business than to cyclists. Laura Jones’s outraged face became familiar to all Global viewers (and not all of us were happy about that). And CTV interviewed Charles Gauthier of the Downtown Business Improvement Association, who complained about lost parking spaces. While conceding that there would be alternative parking, he lamented that shoppers might be deterred by having to walk a little further. (As we all know, the normal experience in downtown Vancouver is to drive straight into a parking right outside the business of your choice)

As a matter of fact, cyclists do spend money. These bikes are parked while their owners refresh themselves at a restaurant in False Creek.
(Photo by Average Joe Cyclist)
Hopefully, at some point business owners will begin to realize that potential customers can arrive by other means than cars, and that cyclists do actually shop. Boy, do we shop. Anyone who would pay a couple of hundred dollars for a 3 oz cycling jersey is no stranger to shopping. In fact, once alternative transport makes city access more comfortable and convenient, business might even improve. The VACC is tackling business resistance head-on, with its Business for Bikes initiatives, managed by Erin O’Melinn, which aims to create a robust group of businesses that openly support cycling.
But it’s not even just about moving towards a sustainable future for Vancouver. It’s also about another vital aim: making sure that ordinary people cycling in Vancouver will be safer. Without this, we cannot expect the majority of people to embrace cycling as a viable means of transportation for themselves and their families.
In a previous post in the Vancouver Observer, SFU Assistant Professor Janet Moore put it eloquently. Expressing her fears as she cycled across town, and her hope that the planned Hornby Bike Lane would go ahead, she wrote:
“I’m a mom on a bike just trying to get to work. ... This is not about bike lanes. It is about the future of Vancouver for my kids. ... Imagine a future where everyone felt safe getting around in our city.”
Janet nailed it: it’s about safety, first and foremost. It’s about moms and dads and kids and seniors being able to get from A to B, on a bike, without getting killed. And once they can do that, then we will have an important foundation for creating a sustainable city as we ride boldly into the future. As Mayor Robertson put it:
“Hornby Street’s open. … I’m not worried about the popularity piece of it. This is really important infrastructure for downtown Vancouver. We build streets, we build sidewalks. Building good bike lanes is important for our future.”
And it’s not just our mayor who gets this. Residents of Vancouver have shown their support. In September, the Mustel Group survey found that most Vancouverites supported the Hornby Bike Lane, and 45% planned to use it. By November 2010, Mayor Robertson’s approval ratings had soared to 43%. That’s astonishingly high for a Canadian politician (because don’t we just love to hate them?). The VACC reflected the general sentiment when it held a celebratory ride on December 14th (in typical Vancouver winter weather – pouring rain) to celebrate the opening of the Hornby Bike Lane.
To me, this public support – despite a minority of detractors – sends the encouraging message that most Vancouverites support creating a safer, more sustainable city. Even if it does mean that we’ll have to somehow survive with 158 fewer car parking spots.
More of Average Joe Cyclist's writings can be found on his blog: Average Joe's Cycling blog.





More propoganda and BS from the cycling coalition....
"Surveys show that 60% of residents would cycle downtown if it was safe."
So mayor moonbeam states that he hopes to increase the less than 4% that currently commute to downtown by bike up to 10% in the coming years (a percentage deemed completely unrealistic by most observers), yet "Joe cyclist" likes to give the impression that the majority of Vancouverites are really going to use these lanes.
It's more utter nonsense from the cycling coalition. It's also not "a small but vocal minority" but rather according to the latest polls approx. 50% of the city who disagree with the downtown lanes and 1/3 who were unhappy with the way the government implemented them.
Keep spewing your nonsense....
@Average Vancouverite: it makes me lol when I see how angry people who don't bike get. Maybe they need more exercise? Because you know what you get stressed out when you're not exercising. If you werent so angry maybe you would not get so angry with people who have different opinions? If you don't want to exercise, maybe just get some help with that anger? Anger management maybe? Or maybe a prescription for some Viagra? (because that problem can also lead to lots of anger).
make me sad. This city is so expensive to live in that people need viable transportation alternatives. Yes, there are buses and skytrain but face it - that is not a low cost alternative. I have been so proud of our Mayor and Vision Vancouver for finally making these necessary improvements. Regardless of the popularity of the the decisions, this had to be done.
10% city trips by bike is a modest aim, even in our car obsessed culture, when compared to other cities. Copenhagen has 55% of city trips made by bike (July 2009), Tokoyo Japan 25% and Munich Germany 20%. Sad to say that no cities in North America have achieved double digit bicyle trips. The most recent US census revealed that over 90% of Americans are still commuting by car, 77% of those ALONE in their vehicles. Come on people - is this smart?
Gas prices are set to soar again this year in some cases predicted to rise to $1.50 per litre. We will be forced to changed our ways eventually.
@Simon C - thanks for the kind words. What a great idea for a toast. I have just decided that I will make it my New Year's resolution to do even a higher percentage of all my trips by bike. Eventually I will achieve 100% ...
@ Maggie N. Thanks for the stats, Maggie - at one and the same time inspiring and humbling. Wouldn't it be great if Vancouver was the first city in North America to achieve double digits?
Like you, I am proud of our mayor - wow, one does NOT get to say those words very often about a politician representing us!
It may be true that not many people are biking around town these days but I would have to say that this is becuase poeple do not feel safe! If you build it they will come! How I would love to be able to bike down town with my gilrs and not worry that they will be run down by a speeding car!!! I am so excited that vancouver is now making a lot of progress towards this dream
Hi Average Joe:
Despite the minority of angry and illogical ranters, there are plenty of people who believe that cycling is on the increase, and in a big way. And Vancouverites love their green city.
Keep the positivity and clear messages coming.
@ Big Moo - thanks! Good to hear from you. I agree that most Vancouverites love their green city, and have the intelligence to realize that cycling is an important part of our future. Pity about those odd, angry people, but at least they are just a minority. Which means there is hope for our city's future ...
I think this whole argument distills into something simple and elegant: Safe Access.
I equate bike lanes to the graded curbs on sidewalks. Years ago, you would never find a sidewalk with a graded curb, it was a straight drop down which made it very hard for anyone in a wheelchair or pushing a stroller etc. After advocacy from the disabled community, you can't find a sidewalk without a smooth gradual curb anywhere in the country. Initially focused on one tiny part of the community now simply a part of everyday life.
Would Average Vancouverite rail against graded curbs now too, just because there are so few handicapped citizens? Also @ A..V...(hypothetically speaking) what if your daughter was riding a bike downtown, wouldn't you want her to be safe in a bike lane on her own, or in traffic with painted lines on either side? (think about that really hard ;)
Peace! Jamie www.pedalpundit.blogspot.com
@ Pedal Pundit - Hey Jamie, thanks :)
I think that is an excellent comparison. There always seem to be people who cling to the status quo, railing furiously about any kind of change. Yet change happens, and it is often for the good - such as accessibility for strollers and the disabled community, as you mention. My wife often talks about how recycling was once "lunatic fringe" and then suddenly one day it was everywhere, and now no one finds it strange at all.
Glad you brought up the example of someone's daughter. My own passion for safe cycling was sparked the day I first tried to take my then 8-year-old daughter cycling, on a quiet cycling route (Adanac). The road was very quiet - until suddenly she was almost mowed down by a teenage driver screeching out of Templeton School at high speed. I never took her cycling again. I won't let any of my kids cycle for transport, until we get to the point where it is safe - which for me comes down to separate bike lanes, so that kids and seniors (and everyone in between) can cycle safely. During the last 2 years, we have finally begun to move quite rapidly towards this dream.
Apoligies for any repitition:
Cities such as Calgary and Edmonton are free to expand evenly.
Vancouver, as a coastal city is not, and after 125 years it has become an out the way place.
Central communities are now Surrey, south of the Fraser River, and Port Coquitlam, north of the River. They are approximately halfway between Wreak Beach and the end of tidal water at the Mission Bridge.
I am repeating a quote that I heard at a Transportation meeting held in New West last fall:
"Riding a bike should not require bravery"
Regardless of the numbers of cyclists, when this statement becomes a reality in the lower mainland, all of us will be the better for it.
@ Dale Darychuk. Great quote. I could not agree more. Bike routes should be accessible to all - not just the quick and the brave. When I did an assessment ride with the Burnaby VACC, one of the guys made the point that one does not assess a bike route with the question "Could Alberto Contador do this route easily and safely?" in mind. The question should rather be: "Could my kids and my granma do this route easily and safely?" When we get to this point, cycling will become as widespread as it is in Europe, where in some cities more than half of all trips are completed by bike. And that would be better for motorists too. Given that most cars are occupied by just ONE person, almost every bike = one less car (and thus far less traffic congestion).
I was very happy to read this post. Walking to work every day in downtown Vancouver, I watch the motorists with despair and disgust. All those fat, middle-aged people, each one sitting in a huge fat car, spewing pollution into the planet that WE (the young people coming up) are going to have to clean up. Are they demented? Are they insane? Can so many people really be THAT stupid? Are they so fat that they need an SUV to get to work??? there are buses and bike lanes everywhere, yet these stupid, SELFISH people need to be all alone in their big fat cars, destorying MY chance for a future. I hate themn, and I hate people like that aveage vancouverite above, because I bet he is just another one of them, fat and selfish in his pollution spewing car too lazy to get off his fat ass and walk or ride a bike, not giving a dam that he is destroying OUR planet. and then he has the cheek to be angry at bikers! he is the one we should be angry with - and I AM@! and how dare he call our mayor mayor moonbeam - it is him and his kind who are crazy, thinking they have the right to do this to our precious planet, while not giving a dam about future generations who will choke to death in the fumes they leave behind!
Where I am in favour of biker safety, and the sustainable model of transport that biking represents, I think that more cooperation with other cities in the lower mainland to expand more trains and buses must also be considered. As someone living in New West, I am unlikely to bike into work. But, I'll take the train. If we're talking sustainability, and 'livability', isn't the bigger picture about better air quality, less reliance on fossil fuels, and achieving a greater reach as far as traveling around the area in which we live without having to own a car at all? This is what I'd love to see for this region of the world. And with a bulging population in the suburbs of Vancouver, I hesitate to call us a 'green city' where so many of us are having to drive to so many destinations where buses and trains don't go, and where, frankly, it's too far to bike.
@Rob Jones. Good points Ron. I read about a guy who kept two bikes - one stored in a locker somewhere on Main Street, and one at home. To get to work, he would bike from his home (in Surrey I think) to the skytrain, lock up his bike at the Surrey skytrain, take the skytrain to work, pick up his other bike on Main Street, and bike to work. An ingenious work-around, because it enabled him to use the skytrain at peak hour (when bikes are not allowed on the skytrain). I think that the city should facilitate these kinds of creative solutions, by providing cheap, safe bike lockers downtown, and making public transit a bit more affordable. If we can get to the point where it is easy, safe and cheap to use alternative modes of transport (non-car), then surely it will catch on. Most people stick to their cars because, as you correctly point out, they have no practical alternatives.
I learned to bike as a boy and it was a fun adventure. Now as a grown man I am frequently intimidated by cars and busses on our roads. It should not require my screwing up my courage to the sticking point in order to get from A to B on a bike in the Lower Mainland. To preserve our planet and reduce congestion on our roads, we need safe cycling routes everywhere. I applaud the efforts of the Mayor and his council. Also, thanks for this great summary of progress made in the past year. It is to be hoped that other municipalties will follow Vancouver's sterling example.
Hopefully we will get the bike share very soon. Keeping 2 lockers would cost $60 for 3 mo or $200/yr. A bike share program would work very well for this commuter from Surrey. The new infrastructure coupled with a bike share program would see the number of cyclists increase a lot. Hopefully the bike law will be ammended to allow for this otherwise the bike share program may suffer like Melbourne, Austrailia.
@Rob Jones. Good points Ron. I read about a guy who kept two bikes - one stored in a locker somewhere on Main Street, and one at home. To get to work, he would bike from his home (in Surrey I think) to the skytrain, lock up his bike at the Surrey skytrain, take the skytrain to work, pick up his other bike on Main Street, and bike to work. An ingenious work-around, because it enabled him to use the skytrain at peak hour (when bikes are not allowed on the skytrain). I think that the city should facilitate these kinds of creative solutions, by providing cheap, safe bike lockers downtown, and making public transit a bit more affordable. If we can get to the point where it is easy, safe and cheap to use alternative modes of transport (non-car), then surely it will catch on. Most people stick to their cars because, as you correctly point out, they have no practical alternatives.